MSNBC’s O’Donnell Blames Bush & GOP for Deaths in Tucson, ‘Soulless’ NRA Against Cutting Homicide Rate
Catching up on an item from the Tuesday, January 11, Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell, MSNBC host O’Donnell blamed President Bush and the Republican-controlled Congress of 2004 for some of the deaths in the Tucson shootings because they did not have the "basic human decency" to renew the assault weapons ban and require Jared Loughner to reload his weapon sooner. O’Donnell talked of learning which victims would be alive if not for Bush and Republicans. O’Donnell:
When the investigation reveals the exact order of the 31 shots fired, we will be able to do the grim accounting and tell you exactly, exactly who would be alive today if the Republican House, the Republican Senate and the Republican President had the basic human decency to do the right thing in 2004.
Later in the show, he quoted the spokesman of the National Rifle Association and tagged him as "soulless" for opposing a rush to pass new gun control laws. He went on to contend that the NRA believes "there should be absolutely no restrictions on access to guns," and suggested that the NRA wants to keep the murder rate in America above that in other countries. O’Donnell:
Quote, "Anything other than prayers for the victims and their families at this time would be inappropriate." So says the soulless spokesman for the National Rifle Association, the most successful special interest lobby in the history of lobbying. Success in lobbying is scored according to how difficult your case is. The NRA has a very difficult case to make, that there should be absolutely no restrictions on access to guns and bullets in this country, and that we must never allow our homicide rate to fall below any other country`s homicide rate.
Below is a transcript of the relevant portions of the Tuesday, January 11, Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell on MSNBC:
LAWRENCE O’DONNELL: Remember when President Bush and the Congress allowed the assault weapons ban to expire in 2004? No? Well, no one put up much of a fight, but if Congress cared as much about controlling bullets as it cares about controlling tax rates and it had extended the assault weapons ban, Jared Loughner would have needed to reload after firing half as many bullets as he did - half. Imagine the amount of grief that could have been saved if 15 of those bullets were never fired.
When the investigation reveals the exact order of the 31 shots fired, we will be able to do the grim accounting and tell you exactly, exactly who would be alive today if the Republican House, the Republican Senate and the Republican President had the basic human decency to do the right thing in 2004.
...
O`DONNELL: Time for tonight’s "Rewrite," quote, "Anything other than prayers for the victims and their families at this time would be inappropriate." So says the soulless spokesman for the National Rifle Association, the most successful special interest lobby in the history of lobbying.
Success in lobbying is scored according to how difficult your case is. The NRA has a very difficult case to make, that there should be absolutely no restrictions on access to guns and bullets in this country, and that we must never allow our homicide rate to fall below any other country`s homicide rate.
No, no one has a more difficult lobbying case to make than the NRA, but the NRA exercises virtually flawless mind control over Republicans and has left Democrats cowering in fear for decades. Democrats lost the congressional election that followed their last serious effort at gun control in 1994, so they have studiously avoided the subject since then. In 2004, the most liberal of the viable candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination ran as a pro-gun Democrat. And the eventual nominee made sure he was photographed on the hunt with his shotgun.
In the last presidential election, the subject of guns never came up. And the Democratic Party’s surrender to the NRA was complete. Liberals have picked other fights, willing to go to the mat over a four percent difference in the top tax rate, after blithely allowing the gun control law they passed in 1994 to expire 10 years later.
Since the massacre on Saturday, precious few Democrats have come forward with a relevant response. On this program last night, New York Congresswoman Carolyn McCarthy announced that she will try to reinstate the 1994 ban on high-capacity ammunition magazines that allowed Jared Loughner to fire 31 shots instead of the 15 that the gun was limited to until 2004. Her colleague New Jersey Senator Frank Lautenberg says he’s planning to introduce similar legislation in the Senate. And tonight, you heard California Senator Barbara Boxer and Congressman Robert Brady tell me of their support for that legislation.
And all the smart talkers in Washington insist that kind of legislation has no chance and will probably never even come to a vote. No liberal groups have sprung into action to flood their vast e-mail lists to support Congresswoman McCarthy and Senator Lautenberg, as they have for so many other issues that have come up during the Obama presidency, from the public option to the top tax rate. The collapse of conscience among professional politicians in Washington is not surprising. The silence of the grassroots organizations that are so quick to spring into action for other legislative items was not predictable and dispiriting.
And so Congress will follow the NRA’s orders. Anything other than prayers for the victims and their families at this time would be inappropriate. So, instead of going to work tomorrow, members of Congress will hide behind religion, and the media will look on in wide-eyed awe at their piety. Congress’s prayers will not be heard by the next madman out there in search of an automatic weapon to open fire at a college or a supermarket or a post office. And thanks to the NRA’s and Congress’s prayers, the next shooter will easily be able to get off at least 30 shots before he has to reload.
- Brad Wilmouth's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
Everybody at MSNBC is a
Submitted by jdawg2009 on Wed, 01/19/2011 - 10:13am.
Everybody at MSNBC is a raving lunatic. No wonder it's the network of insane liberal hate.
"we will be able to do the
Submitted by rwesley2.0 on Wed, 01/19/2011 - 10:13am.
"we will be able to do the grim accounting and tell you exactly, exactly who would be alive today"
Yeeeahhhh. I'm gonna have to disagree with you on this, m'kay?
They can't even tell us what's in bills they churn out now but somehow you believe they are the gold standard with regards to this? No sale, Larry.
Spelling check needed
Submitted by Deskpilot on Wed, 01/19/2011 - 10:13am.
is his name spelled F-O-O-L, or T-O-O-L.
I just went to the eye Dr. the other day and I swear she said I only need reading glasses (+1.00)
MS-NBC must love newsbusters.org
Submitted by pockets64 on Wed, 01/19/2011 - 10:23am.
If not for Newsbusters posting the stupid things they say at MS-NBC, no one would know what's going on over there.
Is it appropriate to say "blood libel"....?
Submitted by NeoKong on Wed, 01/19/2011 - 10:29am.
Because it sure sounds like O'Donnell just accused the NRA of wanting large numbers of people to die of gun violence.
P.S. Note to O'donnell. The Democrats just held an unstoppable majority for the last two years. They could have passed any gun law they wanted you idiot.
I was wonder when the "Blame
Submitted by Beukeboom on Wed, 01/19/2011 - 10:35am.
I was wonder when the "Blame Bush" crowd would start shouting.
C'mon Comcast...it's time to clean house at MSNBC and start anew.
As much as I'd like Comcast to clean house ASAP
Submitted by IgnatzJFahrquar on Wed, 01/19/2011 - 10:42am.
I can see them letting contracts run out and slowly purging the slimey buildup in their pipes. Of course, it would be nice for them to make an example/statement by canning one of the buffoons ASAMFP
Your scenario is admittedly
Submitted by Beukeboom on Wed, 01/19/2011 - 2:59pm.
Your scenario is admittedly the most plausible but I would think it would make a better and bigger statement if Comcast bought out the contracts, dismissed most if not all of their hosts, played movies for a couple of days while they get their new talent in place and start completely over. Different network branding, different network name, different faces...the whole ball of wax so to speak. That's what *I* would like but realistically your scenario is more likely. And I doubt if many would be let go. I think that once one or two of the lowest rated shows were canceled (like Shultz's) the others would see the safety net that GE offered was being taken away and they would probably shift their tone to more centrist and perhaps even more balanced. Now whether that would work is debatable and it would take time even if they implemented such a strategy.
However since the 51% takeover has now been approved we shall see what Comcast does to try to elevate MSNBC/NBC from the pits of ratings. I still think it's possible that Comcast may at least rename/rebrand MSNBC to try to make it more autonomous.
Only a Decadent Society
Submitted by JustAl on Wed, 01/19/2011 - 10:40am.
Could give rise to such wastes of skin. Have we undercut evolution by being too productive a society? Creatures like this would never be able to feed themselves in a more primative society, so how the hell did his genome survive?
An interesting
Submitted by Willis_Leon_Johnson on Wed, 01/19/2011 - 11:06am.
An interesting conclusion....
"we must never allow our homicide rate to fall below any other country`s homicide rate."
How about we aim for a tie with Switzerland where EVERY home has a government issued fully automatic weapon with all the ammunition they need?
End 'gun violence in America' - Require training and MANDATORY "Shall Carry" by every Citizen.
If harry reid is the best person to lead the senate, what does that say about the other 99 senators?
(No subject)
Submitted by NVRAT on Wed, 01/19/2011 - 11:11am.
(No subject)
Submitted by NVRAT on Wed, 01/19/2011 - 11:12am.
(No subject)
Submitted by NVRAT on Wed, 01/19/2011 - 11:12am.
Boy, his ratings must really
Submitted by Barack_must_go..... on Wed, 01/19/2011 - 11:12am.
Boy, his ratings must really be in the toilet. Not good for Larry considering the new bosses take over soon.
Desperate times make for even more desperation from liberal douchebags.
Barack_Must_Go.....
O`Donnell, Bush and the GOP
Submitted by NVRAT on Wed, 01/19/2011 - 11:28am.
Well, Lawrence lets face it, Jared Loughner is a product of your sacred Left Wing world. Guns and clips had nothing to do with his escapade. I`m suprized you aren`t applauding him after all you and your ilk are experts at mind control of the weak. The NRA just might be the last bastion of freedom in the US and I know the likes you of just hate the fact that the Consitution gets in your way.
Leopards never change their spots...only the method of attack. Beware in 2012.
O'Donnell/Bush & NRA
Submitted by sarge329 on Wed, 01/19/2011 - 11:33am.
Wow! Whoulda thunk it? It's Bush's fault! Again.Talk about a one-trick pony. Everything is Bush's fault. OK. Let's look at this logically. Did Mr. Loughner have a history of mental instability? From all accounts, yes. Have the existing gun laws, that's the ones on the books now, been enforced to the fullest extent possible in accordance with the Constitution? No. Was Bush in Tucson at the time of the shooting? No. Well, I'd say that, based on those facts that Bush was not and could not be at fault. So, who's next? Let's move on to civility, shall we? Could shrilly yelling, at the top of one's lungs, at a guest be considered ' civil ' ? I don't see how. I seem to recall the current ocupant of my White House ( that's mine and yours, not his; he sure hasnt earned it ) acting Clintonesque, solemnly stating that we need to be civil at this time. One would think that the need for civility would extend to both sides of the aisle. Based on recent rhetoric, nothing seems to be further from the truth.
another blathering idiot
Submitted by Dr. Ron on Wed, 01/19/2011 - 12:10pm.
The "blame Bush" mantra has shielded Obama for 2 years...it seems to be a virus as now another knee-jerk, leftist talking head has adopted it...give me a break!
Let's see now: Bush did it; Palin did it; Fox News did it; Rush did it...and, of course Cheney pulled all the strings. We can see what the MSM substitutes for thought...devisive name-calling and blame-gaming...wonder when they will change either the air or straw they have for brains.
O'Donnell...sometimes actor, sometime flacking for The West Wing, sometimes standing in for Keith Olbermann...but always, in his own words:" I am not a liberal who is so afraid of the word that I had to change my name to progressive. Liberals amuse me. I am a socialist. I live to the extreme left, the extreme left of you mere liberals.' A perfect fit for mendacious TV aka MSNBC
We can play the 'blame game' too....
Submitted by Willis_Leon_Johnson on Wed, 01/19/2011 - 12:22pm.
Phrases Boenher needs to learn and use regularly.
"We inherited this (insert issue here) from the failed policies of the last two democrat controlled congresses"
"We inherited this (insert issue here) from the failed policies of the current administration,"
"Until the democrats SEIZED CONTROL of both houses in 2006 the United States of America had a robust, thriving economy."
End 'gun violence in America' - Require training and MANDATORY "Shall Carry" by every Citizen.
If harry reid is the best person to lead the senate, what does that say about the other 99 senators?
O'Donnell & Gun Control
Submitted by sargex1 on Wed, 01/19/2011 - 3:06pm.
To the point Mr. O'donnell if you want guns outlawed the I suggest you propse admending the constitution . If you can't do it then shut the F up. By the way, constitution or not "It is my god given right to be armed if I so Choose."