Fineman Joins Uygur in Trashing Tea Party, O’Donnell ‘Makes Sharron Angle Look Like Doris Kearns Goodwin’
Appearing as a guest on Tuesday’s Countdown show on MSNBC, the Huffington Post’s Howard Fineman – formerly of Newsweek – joined substitute host Cenk Uygur in mocking Delaware Republican Senate nominee and the Tea Party as Uygur discussed O’Donnell’s recent comments about the words "separation of church and state" not being in the Consititution. After Uygur asked if the views of the Delaware Republican "speak poorly of the people who elected her, namely the Tea Party voters," Fineman agreed with Uygur’s negative view of the Tea Party and went on to trash Nevada Republican Senate nominee Sharron Angle as he contended that O’Donnell "makes Sharron Angle look like Doris Kearns Goodwin." Fineman:
Yeah, it probably doesn’t help the Tea Party at all. I mean, I suppose you could argue that having Christine O’Donnell around and speaking the way she did today makes Sharron Angle look like Doris Kearns Goodwin or something. But it, you know, that’s the only way she might be useful as a point of contrast. And what’s really killing here, what’s damning here is that the Tea Party is run in the name of rights and freedom. And all of those rights and freedoms are enshrined in the very amendments that she seems totally ignorant of.
Fineman also made no mention of the legitimate debate over the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment and whether the children of illegal immigrants born in America should be considered natural-born American citizens as he mocked conservatives over the Fourteenth Amendment: "And, you know, they’re some of the amendments that they’re also questioning right now because the Fourteenth Amendment basically says that everyone here who’s born here, naturalized here, is a citizen of the United States, and their rights cannot be abridged by any of the states. And yet, the sort of local orientation of the Tea Party, you heard Christine O’Donnell talk about local option. what the local people want to do. You know, that’s something that is protected by the Fourteenth Amendment."
He soon added: "That’s what the Civil War was, that’s sort of what the Civil War was about."
When Uygur wondered which religion would the Tea Party movement want to make into the state religion of America, Fineman took a shot at Kentucky Republican Senate nominee Rand Paul as he cracked: "I think there’s an answer to this question, Cenk. It’s the Aqua Buddha religion of Rand Paul when he was in college. I think we’re all going to have to, we’re all going to have to be worshiping Aqua Buddha after the Tea Party takes charge."
Below is a transcript of the relevant portion of the Tuesday, October 19, Countdown show on MSNBC:
CENK UYGUR: Now, let’s turn to MSNBC political analyst Howard Fineman, senior political editor for Huffington Post as well. Good evening, Howard.
HOWARD FINEMAN, MSNBC POLITICAL ANALYST: Hi, Cenk.
UYGUR: All right, look, even if O’Donnell has already been written off politically, Howard, do her views speak poorly of the people who elected her, namely the Tea Party voters?
FINEMAN: Yeah, it probably doesn’t help the Tea Party at all. I mean, I suppose you could argue that having Christine O’Donnell around and speaking the way she did today makes Sharron Angle look like Doris Kearns Goodwin or something. But it, you know, that’s the only way she might be useful as a point of contrast. And what’s really killing here, what’s damning here is that the Tea Party is run in the name of rights and freedom. And all of those rights and freedoms are enshrined in the very amendments that she seems totally ignorant of. So that’s really the crushing contrast here.
UYGUR: Well, you know, they always seem to say that they care so much about the Constitution. But other than the Second Amendment and this bizarre theory on the Tenth Amendment, I never really honestly saw them give a damn. I mean, when Bush was running over the Fourth Amendment, when we still have warrantless wiretaps, I’ve never seen them protest that. Have they, have you seen them protest anything outside of those two or care about anything outside of those two amendments?
FINEMAN: No, not really, except that the whole sort of the mood music, the theme music, if you will, of the Tea Party is "don’t tread on me" and "don’t trample on my rights." And that’s a big part of what the Bill of Rights is all about, and they were enshrined and made applicable to all the states and to all citizens by the post-Civil War amendments. And, you know, they’re some of the amendments that they’re also questioning right now because the Fourteenth Amendment basically says that everyone here who’s born here, naturalized here, is a citizen of the United States, and their rights cannot be abridged by any of the states. And yet, the sort of local orientation of the Tea Party, you heard Christine O’Donnell talk about local option. what the local people want to do. You know, that’s something that is protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.
UYGUR: Yeah, I love that argument. I love the Constitution and I’d like to repeal the Fourteenth Amendment.
FINEMAN: Yes.
UYGUR: It doesn’t make much sense to me. But, Howard-
FINEMAN: That’s what the Civil War was, that’s sort of what the Civil War was about.
UYGUR: Yeah, I think we had a war over that. That’s right. So, now, real quick, though, let’s pick a religion because if we’re going to establish a religion, and there’s no separation of church and state, we got to pick one, right? Is it going to be Episcopalian? Southern Baptist? Mormon maybe, Harry Reid, Mitt Romney?
FINEMAN: I think there’s an answer to this question, Cenk. It’s the Aqua Buddha religion of Rand Paul when he was in college. I think we’re all going to have to-
UYGUR: It’s not a bad answer. I hadn’t thought of that.
FINEMAN: We’re all going to have to be worshiping Aqua Buddha after the Tea Party takes charge.
UYGUR: Right, I presume they’re not going with Islam. That’s probably out, but-
FINEMAN: Probably out. But Aqua Buddha, keep your eye on that one.
UYGUR: Okay, I will.
FINEMAN: Okay.
UYGUR: All right, Howard Fineman, senior editor for the Huffington Post, thanks for joining us.
FINEMAN: Thank you.
- Brad Wilmouth's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
‘Makes Sharron Angle Look Like Doris Kearns Goodwin’
Submitted by Tugboat Phil on Wed, 10/20/2010 - 8:01am.
I didn't read the article, but does it really make Angle look like a pompous, plagiarist?
Doris the plagiarist?
Submitted by Tim Graham on Wed, 10/20/2010 - 8:01am.
I have trouble understanding how Christine O'Donnell makes Sharron Angle look more like a Kennedy-ring-kissing plagiarist.
I was thinking like you and Phil
Submitted by Galvanic on Wed, 10/20/2010 - 8:31am.
Goodwin isn't exactly a role model for integrity.
They must be talking about
Submitted by mattm on Wed, 10/20/2010 - 9:37am.
They must be talking about looks.
Fineman, MSNBC "political analyst"
Submitted by SickofLibs on Wed, 10/20/2010 - 8:29am.
Appearing on OlbyPlanet almost every night shamelessly spewing the same exact crap = analyst at MSNBC.
"Our Own" Howard Fineman, have you no respect for yourself, Sir? This is no way to make a living.
she's dead-on correct
Submitted by spepper on Wed, 10/20/2010 - 8:34am.
Christine O'Donnell was dead-on correct about the words "separation of church and state" not being in the Constitution-- the days are numbered of the political careers of her opponents, these liberal pinhead elitist snobbish Hamptons-vacationing gun-grabbing Marxist-boot-licking types, of EITHER "party"......
Isn't it refreshing?
Submitted by c5then on Wed, 10/20/2010 - 8:45am.
That a regular person can read the Constitution and understand it without having to be "taught" what it "really"
means. O'Donnel can simply read the 1st amendment and understand what it says and more importantly understand the BULLSH!T that has been "taught" about it for what it is.
That is the type of person that we need to send to D.C. Not some over-educated elitist who thinks that they have all the answers, but someone who will pull out their pocket constitution during a debate on a bill and say..." Nope, I've read it through and it doesn't give us the authority to enact this bill into law. If we do we will be breaking our oath of office."
Madison and Jefferson and Franklin built a Republic - Roberts killed it!
On a roll with character people
Submitted by Tomorama on Wed, 10/20/2010 - 8:56am.
Goodwin and Barnicle, wow, this "network" knows how to pick their character people.
"There are NO ideas that are not worth stealing to make a buck or make me seem smart".............. (C).
I said it MessNBC, don't steal it from me it has the (C) dammit.
Intellectual corruption
Submitted by KC Mulville on Wed, 10/20/2010 - 9:15am.
I happened to pass by Larry King last night, and saw a panel of pundits -- all four, liberals, including Penn of Penn & Teller. (Which just proves that anyone can be a pundit.) King allowed a caller to ask where in the constitution were the words "separation of church and state?"
Immediately, they all agreed, "first amendment."
Then Larry King, constitutional genius that he is, said that the first amendment prohibited the establishment of religion. Then he repeated, "establishment of religion." As if the phrase inevitably led to a complete ban on anything religious. The rest of the panel nodded their heads.
Like the students at Widener Law School, Chris Coons, and the entire media complex, they take it for granted that the first amendment bans all forms of public acknowledgement of religion, which is way beyond establishment of a state church
That's simply intellectual corruption. It's refusing to recognize a controversy as a way of dispensing with the need to answer the basic questions. The ban on establishing a state religion is interpreted as a ban on any mention of religion. That broadening of the ban to where it stands today has always been controversial. For the law schools, and for media magicians like Penn, to brush it off as something that "everyone knows" shows how intellectually corrupt they are.
Larry The Praying Mantis was confused...
Submitted by SickofLibs on Wed, 10/20/2010 - 9:27am.
he was thinking of the Magna Carta, which was a big-effing deal around the time he was born.
More to the point, the First
Submitted by HockeyKid on Wed, 10/20/2010 - 9:49am.
More to the point, the First Amendment says "Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, nor prohibiting the free exercise thereof".
This simply means that Congress can't make any laws about the establishment (i.e., federally defined form) of religion, neither in favor nor against. In today's English it would say "Congress shall make no law with respect to", or perhaps, "make no law regarding". Any law Congress has ever passed in this subject area is unconstitutional.
Also, it puts no restrictions whatsoever on the Executive Branch, the courts, the states, municipalities, nor the employees thereof.
"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me
Just to nitpick, Penn
Submitted by Francisco on Wed, 10/20/2010 - 9:57am.
Just to nitpick, Penn Jillette is hardly a "liberal", being one of the most famous and outspoken Libertarians in the entertainement business (big Ayn Rand fan)... Being atheist does not a liberal make...
Apparently Fineman and Uygur
Submitted by HockeyKid on Wed, 10/20/2010 - 9:41am.
Apparently Fineman and Uygur think that being on TV makes them smart. Their "understanding" of American history and the Constitution is so laughably lacking they should be embarrassed.
"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me
I would be willing to bet
Submitted by bassndude on Wed, 10/20/2010 - 11:19am.
I would be willing to bet that if you had asked where at the phrase came from, none of them would have been able to answer the question. I would further be willing to bet that none of them have read the letter Thomas Jefferson wrote to the Danbury Baptist Association in 1802.
Of course, I could be wrong, but considering their conversation here, they seem to belive that the phrase is in the first amendment.
I can't for the life of me figure out how these people ever got the reputation for being intelligent.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal/troll!!