After months of investigation, the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) released a report addressing accusations from some humanitarian groups that its use of white phosphorus (WP) munitions in the Gaza War was a violation of international law, as the report distinguishes between the use of WP as a weapon and the more common non-weapon purposes such as providing smoke screens to conceal troop movements. The pro-Israel group CAMERA recently quoted from the report in the article, "Did Israel’s Use of White Phosphorus Constitute a War Crime?" by Steven Stotsky, on its Web site. The report not only argued that the military's decision to explode the munition in the air was safer for civilians than it would have been to explode it on the ground, but it also suggested that the use of WP to facilitate troops movements also meant civilian casualties were lower than they otherwise would have been by making attacks on Hamas more accurate.
Last January, evening newscasts and some morning newscasts on the broadcast networks and on CNN and FNC reported on accusations from humanitarian groups – with varying degrees of accuracy – with CBS even referring to WP as a "banned weapon," and a "horrific new weapon, " and contending that the IDF may have committed "war crimes." At one point, CNN similarly incorrectly identified WP as a "banned substance." ABC showed a clip of a wounded Palestinian boy charging that Israelis have "no mercy" even for children. (MSNBC does not have a morning or evening newscast equivalent to NBC’s Today show or the NBC Nightly News, so MSNBC coverage was not examined.) But, according to a Nexis search, none of these news programs showed any interest in updating viewers once the Israeli military had made public its say on the matter.
As previously documented by NewsBusters, the January 22 CBS Evening News ran a report (video here), introduced by anchor Katie Couric, which left the impression that the Israeli military had used a "banned weapon," without informing viewers that there are non-weapon uses for WP, and passed on accusations of "war crimes." Couric: "Hamas just ended a bloody war with Israel in Gaza, and tonight there is growing evidence the Israelis may have used a banned weapon. Some even accuse them of war crimes."
![]()
![]()
On the January 25 World News Sunday on ABC, as he introduced a report by correspondent Simon McGregor-Wood, anchor Dan Harris played up complaints against "both sides" in the war, and even suggested that the Israeli side may have been worse in its conduct of the war as he highlighted that there was "especially tough criticism" leveled at Israel. Harris: "Both sides are being dogged now by complaints that they violated the rules of war. Israel has come under especially tough criticism for its use of a chemical agent."
![]()
McGregor-Wood’s report was only somewhat better than that of CBS in that he at least informed viewers that the American military has used WP in recent years, and that it is commonly used to provide smoke screens. But he ended the report by quoting a nine-year-old Palestinian boy as accusing Israel of having "no mercy" even on children, as it was theorized that the boy had been injured by WP. McGregor-Wood: "At Gaza's Shifa Hospital, we found nine-year-old Mohammed al Mamlik, burned when a shell burst above his home. ‘You have no mercy,’ he said to Israel. ‘You're doing everything to us, and we are just children.’"
Of the three broadcast networks, a report filed by NBC's Richard Engel was most favorable to Israel as, on the Sunday, January 11, NBC Nightly News, Engel more directly reported that the purpose of the Israeli military’s use of WP was to "create smoke to conceal troop movements," and informed viewers that it is also used by the American military:
And doctors in Gaza today accused Israel of using controversial white phosphorus munitions. Human rights groups say video from Gaza appears to show white phosphorus shells exploding to create smoke to hide troop movements. The chemical can also be lethal. ... White phosphorus is not illegal under international law. The U.S. military uses it extensively in Afghanistan. Today, Israel refused to comment on white phosphorus, saying only it abides by the laws of war.
After showing a soundbite of human rights activist Marc Garlasco complaining that WP was being used too close to civilians, Engel even passed on the Israeli military’s complaint that Hamas was endangering Palestinian civilians "because its fighters have bunkered in cities and continue to fire 20 rockets and mortars a day into Israel."
On the January 13 Special Report with Bret Baier on FNC, correspondent Reena Ninan similarly informed viewers that while human rights groups were complaining about the use of WP, the substance is used to "mask troop movements." Ninan:
REENA NINAN: The Israeli military uses white phosphorus in artillery shells to create smoke screens to mask troop movements on the ground. Human rights groups say this substance is lethal when used in populated areas and have left burn marks on civilians in Gaza. This video shot exclusively by Fox News shows a destroyed home in Gaza, and this Israeli shell with Hebrew writing reads "exploding smoke," a military description for phosphorus. Palestinian doctors say these shells left dozens injured.
FRED ABRAMS, HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH: It shoots down more than 100 flaming, burning hot wafers which can set homes on fire and burn civilians. And we're beginning to see that now, deep and troubling wounds. It looks like they're being affected by these, by these bombs in populated areas.
NINAN: Israel says the use of exploding smoke is not meant to target civilians.
AVITAL LEIBOVICH, ISRAELI ARMY SPOKESWOMAN: Any munitions we're using is with accordance to the international law.
As Wolf Blitzer teased the January 7 The Situation Room on CNN, he incorrectly claimed that WP is a "banned substance." Blitzer: "Happening now, Israel accused of targeting Gaza with white phosphorus. That's a banned substance that can severely burn civilians."
CNN correspondent Barbara Starr did relay that the American military has used WP, but she did not inform viewers that WP can be used to produce smoke screens, as she only dealt with its use as a weapon:
International protocols prohibit the use of incendiary weapons against civilian populations. In this video, it's not clear if the burning material falls on populated areas. In 2005, the U.S. military acknowledged using white phosphorous in Fallujah to flush out insurgents. Now, the Israelis may be using a similar strategy with a different goal. ... Wolf, whatever these weapons are all about, the Israeli Defense Forces insist they abide by all international laws regarding the use of weapons and ammunition.
On the Thursday, January 15, American Morning on CNN, after U.N. official John Ging was interviewed by anchor John Roberts and related his belief that the fire at a U.N. warehouse had been caused by white phosphorus munitions, anchor Kieren Chetry later recapped the story by claiming that "International law forbids using [WP artillery shells] in densely populated civilian areas," without informing viewers of the other non-weapon uses of white phosphorus. Chetry: "One U.N. official telling CNN that it was hit with white phosphorus artillery shells. International law forbids using them in densely populated civilian areas."
CNN’s Anderson Cooper should be credited for taking a moment on the January 12 Anderson Cooper 360 show to clarify that the use of WP by a military is not necessarily illegal, depending on how it is used. After a report by correspondent Nic Robertson, Cooper prompted Robertson for clarification:
ANDERSON COOPER: Nic, just on the white phosphorus charges, a military is allowed to use white phosphorus on the battlefield for illumination purposes, not against individuals. Is that correct? Am I wrong?
NIC ROBERTSON: No, that's absolutely correct. And that's what Israeli officials are saying. They're saying, we have got the same ammunitions in our weaponry that, for example, NATO forces, U.S. forces have. And we know that, for example, in the Fallujah operation in Iraq in 2004, U.S. troops used white phosphorous for illumination. It's when it falls to the ground, before it fully burns out, that it causes these types of casualties.
Also of note, even though CNN Newsroom does not fit the definition of an evening or morning newscast, during the Thursday, January 15, Newsroom – during the 3:00 p.m. hour – CNN passed on reports that the Israeli military had damaged a United Nations building with white phosphorus munitions. Referring to early reports that someone in the Israeli military or government had inaccurately denied any use of WP, anchor Rick Sanchez expressed a view that there was a "pattern" that was "not helpful" to the Israelis because there had been several accusations regarding the use of WP which the Israeli military had denied each time. CNN’s international correspondent, Jim Clancy, soon accused "both sides" of having a "lack of respect of human life." Sanchez:
But let's go through this. First they said that they were using white phosphorous and they denied it. Then they said, then they were accused of using white phosphorus on people and they denied it, and now they're accused of using white phosphorus on the U.N. building. After awhile there starts to be a pattern there. This is not helpful for Israel around the world, if for no other reason, through perception.
Clancy, a bit later: "It's a lack and respect of human life, we're seeing right now, by both sides. Not by one side, by both sides."
Returning to the Thursday, January 22, report on CBS, as she plugged the story before a commercial break, Couric referred to WP as a "horrific new weapon," even though WP has been in use since World War I: "And coming up next right here on the CBS Evening News, was it a war crime? Israel's accused of using a horrific new weapon against Hamas."
As Couric introduced the piece by correspondent Allen Pizzey, she incorrectly called WP a "banned weapon," and, after ignoring numerous violations of international law perpetrated by Hamas, relayed charges that Israel may have committed "war crimes." Couric: "Hamas gave a thumbs-down to President Obama today, saying his Middle East policy is no different from President Bush's. Hamas just ended a bloody war with Israel in Gaza, and tonight there is growing evidence the Israelis may have used a banned weapon. Some even accuse them of war crimes."
Although Pizzey did vaguely refer to WP as being a "smoke-producing" chemical, he did not clarify that WP is commonly used to produce this smoke to facilitate troop movements, which constitutes a non-weapon use, leaving Couric's suggestion that it was a "banned weapon" and a "horrific new weapon" unchallenged.
Pizzey began his report: "These images are part of what Amnesty International calls indisputable proof the Israeli military illegally used white phosphorus in Gaza. The smoke-producing and incendiary chemical is banned in civilian areas because of its intense heat and fumes." After the CBS correspondent relayed the Israeli point of view that "The Israelis admit firing 200 white phosphorus shells, but deny breaking international law," the rest of the story was devoted to describing WP's effects on humans and making the case against Israel. Pizzey concluded: "The Israelis have ordered an inquiry, but human rights groups are calling for an international investigation."
On the Sunday, January 11, Good Morning America, ABC's Simon McGregor-Wood brought up the WP issue on his network for the first time: "There's mounting concern over Israel's tactics. Human Rights Watch accuses Israel of causing civilian casualties by using these phosphorus shells in built-up areas. That's against international law. Israel denies it."
Later, on the January 11, World News Sunday, during a story – which, on the bright side, focused largely on the deadly obstacles left by Hamas members for Israeli troops to wade through and even credited the Israeli military with trying to avoid civilian casualties – McGregor-Wood this time mentioned that the purpose of phosphorus munitions was to "obscure troop movements." McGregor-Wood: "Human rights campaigners accuse Israel of using shells containing burning white phosphorus. They're meant to obscure troop movements, but Gaza's hospitals are filling up with civilian burn victims."
As anchor Dan Harris introduced the report, he notably contended that "Both sides are now engaging in some unconventional tactics and deceptions," although the report did not specify which of the Israeli military's actions Harris considered to be "unconventional tactics" or "deceptions."
On January 25, ABC revisited the WP issue, and, as anchor Harris set up a report on World News Sunday, he seemed to suggest not only that there was wrongdoing on "both sides" of the conflict, but that the Israeli side may have been worse. Harris: "It's been a week since the fighting in Gaza ended, but both sides are being dogged now by complaints that they violated the rules of war. Israel has come under especially tough criticism for its use of a chemical agent."
In the subsequent report, McGregor-Wood focused on complaints against the Israeli military, but, in contrast to the CBS Evening News, the ABC correspondent did at least inform viewers that the IDF was most likely not aiming WP at people or any other targets – i.e., WP was not being used as a weapon – as he relayed that WP is "good for hiding troop movements." Also unlike CBS, he informed viewers that even the American military has deemed the use of WP as acceptable: "In 2004, the U.S. used it to root out insurgents in Fallujah."
After noting that the substance can cause severe burns if it comes into contact with human skin, he further relayed that "It's controversial, but not banned, unless intentionally used against civilians. But in Gaza, they are everywhere," before passing on a complaint by human rights activist Yael Stein: "There's no doubt that civilians will get injured because of the use of it, and therefore, it is forbidden."
After informing viewers that, "In response to accusations it used phosphorus illegally, the Israeli army has launched an investigation," and that, "In a statement, it would only say it uses weapons permitted by law," McGregor-Wood ominously relayed that "Israel is worried about possible war crimes charges."
While the ABC correspondent’s report had been somewhat balanced up to that point, he seemed to turn more sharply against Israel as he concluded, relaying a quote from a nine-year-old Palestinian boy who may have been injured by WP as the boy accused Israelis of having "no mercy." McGregor-Wood: "At Gaza's Shifa Hospital, we found nine-year-old Mohammed al Mamlik, burned when a shell burst above his home. ‘You have no mercy,’ he said to Israel. ‘You're doing everything to us, and we are just children.’"
Below are more thorough transcripts of the reports cited from ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN and FNC:
#From the Thursday, January 22, CBS Evening News:
KATIE COURIC. BEFORE COMMERCIAL BREAK: And coming up next right here on the CBS Evening News, was it a war crime? Israel's accused of using a horrific new weapon against Hamas.
...
COURIC: Hamas gave a thumbs-down to President Obama today, saying his Middle East policy is no different from President Bush's. Hamas just ended a bloody war with Israel in Gaza, and tonight there is growing evidence the Israelis may have used a banned weapon. Some even accuse them of war crimes. From Gaza, here's Allen Pizzey.
ALLEN PIZZEY: These images are part of what Amnesty International calls indisputable proof the Israeli military illegally used white phosphorus in Gaza. The smoke producing and incendiary chemical is banned in civilian areas because of its intense heat and fumes. The Israelis admit firing 200 white phosphorus shells, but deny breaking international law. The last bombing raid here was a week ago. The area is littered with piece of shrapnel and bits of sticky, gummy brown material like this. Rub it, it bursts into flame and emits an acrid smoke. Distinct characteristics, experts say, of white phosphorous. Saba Halema's hands are an example of the kind of wound white phosphorus inflicts.
DOCTOR NAFEZ ABU SHABAN, AL-SHIFA HOSPITAL CHIEF OF BURN UNIT: In hours, it is becoming much deeper and much wider, plus the smoke comes out from the wound.
PIZZEY: The UN refugee agency says white phosphorus hit its warehouse in the city center.
KAREN ABU ZAYD, UN RELIEF AND WORKS AGENCY: You've got people that have said if it looks like white phosphorus, if it acts like white phosphorus, it must be white phosphorous.
PIZZEY: Jodie Clark risked her life to pull a burning shell from under a fuel tanker.
JODIE CLARK, UN RELIEF AND WORKS AGENCY: I ran to the workshops. Another shell landed, probably 30 meters in front of me, and then just fireworks burst up from the ground and sprayed pellets of a burning substance all over the place.
PIZZEY: This is part of one of the shells.
CLARK: The fire extinguisher didn't put it out. It continued to burn. And in fact, when we went back an hour later to fight the rest of the fire, it was still burning.
PIZZEY: The Israelis have ordered an inquiry, but human rights groups are calling for an international investigation. Allen Pizzey, CBS News, Gaza City.
#From the January 11 World News Sunday:
DAN HARRIS: Now, to another international crisis likely to land in Barack Obama's lap on day one, Gaza. Today, Israeli troops pushed deeper into the most populated areas, engaging in some of the fiercest fighting yet. Both sides are now engaging in some unconventional tactics and deceptions. Simon McGregor-Wood is in Israel tonight.
SIMON MCGREGOR-WOOD: Hamas has left many surprises for Israeli soldiers in Gaza, so many doors are booby-trapped, Israeli soldiers enter buildings by blasting through walls. These tunnels and bunkers stored weapons and hid fighters. Soldiers have discovered dozens of roadside bombs, bomb-sniffing dogs have become a soldier's best friend. At this specially built mock Palestinian town, Israel is training thousands of reservists to send into Gaza's dangerous battlefield. The holes here have already been made. These Israeli reservists are trying to train in an environment as close as possible to the one they may eventually face in Gaza. They're training how to go house to house to find their targets while sparing civilian casualties. But that's not always possible. The Israelis accuse Hamas of shooting from positions crowded with civilians, including schools and mosques. Israel's heavy weapons have caused hundreds of civilian casualties. Human rights campaigners accuse Israel of using shells containing burning white phosphorus. They're meant to obscure troop movements, but Gaza's hospitals are filling up with civilian burn victims. Until now, Israeli forces have encircled Gaza's cities to really damage Hamas. They may have to go further in. That will mean more casualties on both sides. Before any ceasefire, Israel insists Hamas must be unable to rearm. That means shutting down hundreds of smuggling tunnels like these under the Egyptian border that are used by Hamas to smuggle weapons. Israel is pounding them from the air. But once a rock solid diplomatic deal to make sure they remain closed when their soldiers finally leave the increasingly mean streets of Gaza. Simon McGregor-Wood, ABC News, at an Israeli training base in southern Israel.
#From the January 25 World News Sunday:
DAN HARRIS: It's been a week since the fighting in Gaza ended, but both sides are being dogged now by complaints that they violated the rules of war. Israel has come under especially tough criticism for its use of a chemical agent. Simon McGregor-Wood is in Jerusalem tonight.
SIMON MCGREGOR-WOOD: It was these shells that set fire to the main U.N. compound in Gaza City. It burned for days. The shells always burst in midair, sending out streaks of white smoke and bright, burning lumps of phosphorus. It's a chemical that produces clouds of white smoke. It's good for hiding troop movements, but in contact with skin, it causes ferocious burning that's difficult to stop.
MARC GARLASCO, MILITARY ANALYST: You can watch very clearly the jellyfish effect of the white phosphorus shell, and this causes extreme fire and the potential for civilian harm.
SIMON MCGREGOR-WOOD: It's controversial, but not banned, unless intentionally used against civilians. But in Gaza, they are everywhere.
YAEL STEIN, HUMAN RIGHTS ADVOCATE: There's no doubt that civilians will get injured because of the use of it, and therefore, it is forbidden.
SIMON MCGREGOR-WOOD: In response to accusations it used phosphorus illegally, the Israeli army has launched an investigation. In a statement, it would only say it uses weapons permitted by law. But Israel is worried about possible war crimes charges. Today, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert promised the government would defend its soldiers from these charges, just as they had defended Israel in Gaza. Phosphorus has been used since World War I. In 2004, the U.S. used it to root out insurgents in Fallujah. At Gaza's Shifa Hospital, we found nine-year-old Mohammed al Mamlik, burned when a shell burst above his home. "You have no mercy," he said to Israel. "You're doing everything to us, and we are just children." Mohammed's doctor says he's not exactly sure what caused his terrible injuries, but after he was admitted, the burning continued for hours. Simon McGregor-Wood, Jerusalem.
#From the Sunday, January 11, NBC Nightly News:
LESTER HOLT: Overseas now. There are growing signs tonight that Israel's ground offensive into Gaza may be about to enter a new and possibly more intense phase. NBC's chief foreign correspondent, Richard Engel, is near the Israeli/Gaza border and joins us now with the latest. Richard?
RICHARD ENGEL: Good evening, Lester. We've been hearing a steady barrage of artillery fire into Gaza tonight as Israel made its deepest advance yet into Gaza City and sent in some reserve troops. It's a slow, dangerous advance into Gaza City. As Israeli troops push deeper into the city of 400,000, Israel says it is finding an urban minefield, Gaza rigged for battle. Israel intensified its bombing of houses, roads and mosques it claims were boobytrapped with mannequins strapped with bombs, anti-tank mines and waiting suicide bombers.
AVITAL LEIBOVICH, ISRAELI DEFENSE FORCES SPOKESPERSON: We see boobytrapped areas, we see snipers that are all over the civilian neighborhoods, and not only the civilian neighborhoods. Hamas is using a lot of mortar fire.
ENGEL: Today, the Israeli Army showed reporters a video filmed by its soldiers at Gaza City Zoo. Next to a lion's cage, the soldiers follow a cable they say was attached to a bomb. They defused it. But for Palestinians, shelter in Gaza is increasingly hard to find. Thousands are taking refuge in United Nations schools. There's little food or clean water. And doctors in Gaza today accused Israel of using controversial white phosphorus munitions. Human rights groups say video from Gaza appears to show white phosphorus shells exploding to create smoke to hide troop movements. The chemical can also be lethal.
DOCTOR NAFIZ ABU SHA'ABAN, AL-SHIFA HOSPITAL: Burns which we receive here are not like the burns which we used to treat here. It's mostly massive and very deep burns.
ENGEL: White phosphorus is not illegal under international law. The US military uses it extensively in Afghanistan. Today, Israel refused to comment on white phosphorous, saying only it abides by the laws of war.
MARC GARLASCO, HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH: The problem is that the Israelis are dropping them over the refugee camps, and this is causing potential for civilian harm that just can't be justified.
ENGEL: Israel blames Hamas for civilian deaths in Gaza because its fighters have bunkered in cities and continue to fire 20 rockets and mortars a day into Israel. Israeli intelligence believes Hamas has not been able to restock its supply of rockets, but still has enough in reserve to continue firing them into Israel for another two to three weeks, Lester.
#From the Tuesday, January 13, Special Report with Bret Baier:
BRET BAIER: Israel is sending its key negotiator to Egypt Thursday to participate in cease-fire talks. Egyptian mediators are pushing Hamas to accept a truce proposal, and U.N. Secretary-general Ban Ki-Moon is headed to the region. But while many are talking peace, Israeli troops are pushing forward in Gaza. Correspondent Reena Ninan has an update.
REENA NINAN: The Israeli military is now surrounding Gaza city, where half a million Palestinians live pounding with air strikes what is considered the most densely populated place on Earth. Border crossings with Israel and Egypt are closed, and civilians are faced with little choice but to brace themselves and find shelter wherever they can. Of the more than 950 people killed in Gaza since this campaign began, Israel estimates the number of dead Hamas fighters ranges from 400 to 500. The rest are civilians. But Palestinians disagree, saying the majority are civilians. The Israeli military uses white phosphorus in artillery shells to create smoke screens to mask troop movements on the ground. Human rights groups say this substance is lethal when used in populated areas and have left burn marks on civilians in Gaza. This video shot exclusively by Fox News shows a destroyed home in Gaza, and this Israeli shell with Hebrew writing reads "exploding smoke," a military description for phosphorus. Palestinian doctors say these shells left dozens injured.
FRED ABRAMS, HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH: It shoots down more than 100 flaming, burning hot wafers which can set homes on fire and burn civilians. And we're beginning to see that now, deep and troubling wounds. It looks like they're being affected by these, by these bombs in populated areas.
NINAN: Israel says the use of exploding smoke is not meant to target civilians.
AVITAL LEIBOVICH, ISRAELI ARMY SPOKESWOMAN: Any munitions we're using is with accordance to the international law.
NINAN: Today, Hamas released this video showing their snipers shooting down Israeli soldiers. The Israeli army confirmed several of their soldiers have been wounded in combat. Reports suggest Israel would like to end its military campaign before President-elect Barack Obama's inauguration next week. The next few days will determine the substance of an agreement that could end this round of violence. Along the Israeli-Gaza border, Reena Ninan.
#From the January 7, 2009, The Situation Room on CNN:
WOLF BLITZER, AFTER COMMERCIAL BREAK DURING 4:00 P.M. HOUR: Happening now, Israel accused of targeting Gaza with white phosphorus. That's a banned substance that can severely burn civilians. Is there any photographic proof? We're going to go live to the Pentagon. Barbara Starr will have a fact check for us.
...
WOLF BLITZER, DURING THE 5:00 HOUR: Beyond the casualty toll, this war has triggered a humanitarian crisis. In Israel, where a million people are within Hamas rocket range, schools and public institutions near the border have been closed. But in Gaza, it's truly a nightmare. Relief agencies say two thirds of the population is without electricity right now, and fuel is in very short supply. A U.N. agency reports 800,000 people have no running water. Food is getting into Gaza, but distribution is a problem, leaving many short of basic items. Hospitals operate on generators, but are short of medicine, blood and other supplies. Starbursts lighting up the skies over Gaza, there's controversy right now growing over just what types of munitions are these and how they are being used. Our Pentagon correspondent, Barbara Starr, has been looking into this.
BARBARA STARR: Questions are being asked, what is this weapon the Israelis exploded several times over Gaza? We showed the video to a defense expert.
JOHN PIKE, GLOBALSECURITY.ORG: White phosphorus. Willy peat white phosphorus shells, obviously. There's nothing else like it. That's obviously what it is. No doubt whatsoever.
STARR: But an Israeli official told CNN: "I can tell you with certainty that white phosphorus is absolutely not being used." Israeli officials insist this is just smoke used to mask Israeli movements on the ground. Home rights activists believe the Israeli Defense Forces are using white phosphorus -- an incendiary material that can badly burn anyone in its path.
FRED ABRAHAMS, HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH: But in populated, closed areas, as in Gaza, where civilians can be affected from the burning particles, then it raises very, very serious concerns.
STARR: International protocols prohibit the use of incendiary weapons against civilian populations. In this video, it's not clear if the burning material falls on populated areas. In 2005, the U.S. military acknowledged using white phosphorus in Fallujah to flush out insurgents. Now, the Israelis may be using a similar strategy with a different goal.
PIKE: Hamas combatants are going to see all these bright burning particles coming at them. They're going to put their heads down. They're going to stay indoors. And that's going to give the Israel troops tens of seconds in which they can displace, they can move around out in the open.
STARR: Wolf, whatever these weapons are all about, the Israeli Defense Forces insist they abide by all international laws regarding the use of weapons and ammunition.
#From the Thursday, January 13, CNN Newsroom:
RICK SANCHEZ, INTRODUCING THE 3:00 P.M. HOUR: Is Israel using a chemical against Palestinians in Gaza?
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: These burns are not usual burns, severe, very deep burns.
SANCHEZ: Using white phosphorus against civilians, even combatants, to burn them is against international law.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: It's been burning since 1:00 in the morning Nohir Homada tells our cameraman around noon. If you move it with your feet, it reignites. You can't put it out with water, only with sand. This matches the properties of white phosphorus, which ignites on contact with air.
SANCHEZ: Is Israel using white phosphorus? We examine what Palestinians say, what doctors say, what human rights groups say, and what Israeli military officials are saying in response.
...
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: This resulted from some sort of bomb. These burns are not the usual burns. These are severe. These are very deep.
SANCHEZ: Very deep burns, very nasty injuries, possibly from a very nasty weapon Israel is now being accused of using in Gaza. This is something that may be tough to watch. It burns flesh to the bone. What is white phosphorous? When we come back.
...
SANCHEZ: There's also an important story that's taking place in Gaza. It's about accusations that Israel may be using weapons that international law says they shouldn't use – at least not the way they're accused of using them. This is called white phosphorus. This report is being filed by CNN's Ben Wedeman.
BEN WEDEMAN: Is Israel firing white phosphorus into Gaza? Human Rights Watch says yes, and is backed up by munitions experts. And this, say Palestinian doctors, is the result. Dr. Nafiz Abu Sha'aban says he's been treating burns for 27 years, but says he's never seen anything like these. He says most of the severe burn patients have been sent to Egypt. But because of the fighting, this man, Adil, can't get out.
DR. NAFIZ ABU SHA'ABAN, SHIFA HOSPITAL BURN UNIT: And he was brought to us last night with severe burns on the back, the face, both lower limbs. It's about 47 percent total burned surface area. This resulted from some sort of bombs which might, bombs which contain phosphorus, as we said before, because his burns are not like the usual burns. These are severe. These are very deep burns, with strange heat.
WEDEMAN: White phosphorus is known to burn flesh down to the bone. It's designed to provide illumination or a smokescreen in battle. Under an international protocol ratified by Israel in 1995, such incendiary weapons are allowed when "not specifically designed to cause burn injury to persons."
MARK ELLIS, INTERNATIONAL BAR ASSOCIATION: There's not a, per se, prohibition against using white phosphorus in conflict. But there are significant restrictions as to when it's used and how it's to be used. For instance, it is illegal to use white phosphorus against any personnel – not only civilians, but even legal combatants. So it cannot be directed at personnel. So you're limited to having it directed at military targets.
WEDEMAN: International law says incendiary weapons cannot be used where there is a concentration of civilians – and Gaza is one of the most densely-populated places on Earth. This house north of Gaza City was hit by something Sunday. "It's been burning since 1:00 in the morning," Munir Hammada tells our cameraman around noon. "If you move it with your feet, it reignites. You can't put it out with water, only with sand." This matches the properties of white phosphorus, which ignites on contact with air. Last week, an Israeli official told CNN, "I can tell you with certainty that white phosphorus is absolutely not being used." Now Israeli officials have this response to questions on its use:
MAJOR AVITAL LEIBOVITCH, ISRAELI ARMY SPOKESPERSON: Any munition that Israel is using is with accordance to the international law. Israel does not specify types of munition nor types of operations that it's conducting.
WEDEMAN: The precise extent to which Israel is using white phosphorus is unclear. But the use of such a controversial weapon in the crowded and confined conditions of Gaza is bound to raise questions – questions Israel is, for now, hesitant to answer. Ben Wedeman, CNN, Jerusalem.
SANCHEZ: It sort of makes you ask a lot of questions. Let's do this. Let's go over to our Twitter board, if we can. I think maybe this question is being posed by Nevinews puts it in perspective: "It's not the question of using white phosphorus, it's the question of using it in a dense, civilian populated area." Which is, by the way, pretty true to fact of the way it's written international law. Jim Clancy joining us now. What do you make of this and what have you learned?
JIM CLANCY, CNN INTERNATIONAL: Well, it's a big controversy. You know, in anything like this, you always want to refer to an expert. And I have an expert that's there in Israel right now, trying to get into Gaza. He works for Human Rights – Fred Abrahams. And he tells me, no, it's not illegal, but it's wrong to use it in a civilian area. It's a spectacular picture. A Howitzer puts this up. There's an air burst, Rick. And then 116 of these wafers goes down. Even if the guy covers it up with sand, as we saw in Ben Wedeman's report, if they uncover that, it makes renewed contact with the air, it goes off-
SANCHEZ: So it's a chemical. So when we-
CLANCY: But it's not a chemical weapon.
SANCHEZ: It's not a chemical weapon, but it's a chemical.
CLANCY: Right.
SANCHEZ: It's a dangerous chemical.
CLANCY: It's a very dangerous, very horrible injuries.
SANCHEZ: One that international law says you probably shouldn't use in a manner in which it affects either combatants or civilians in any way. In other words, you can use it in a place where you want to change an area or for military strategy, but don't use it on people?
CLANCY: Yes. They say they're using it as an obscurant, which means that it's going to cover their fighters, cover their tanks as they move into some of these areas. Howitzer fire it overhead, the smoke comes down, the phosphorus comes down, moves everybody out of the way. They get out of the way, and then there's smoke to cover their troops' movement.
SANCHEZ: What kind of impact could this have, though, if it continues to be reported, to the point where it is now and you have somebody like Human Watch, human rights groups saying look, there's a problem here, I think they're doing it, even though Israel is saying, no, we're not.
CLANCY: Human rights investigators and the international media are not getting into Gaza right now. So it's not going to be that big of a problem. And, you know, a few points-
SANCHEZ: Well, is that a problem? If you are going to deny-
CLANCY: Well, sure it is.
SANCHEZ: -something and you're not going to-
CLANCY: Sure it is.
SANCHEZ: -allow reporters to go in there and cover it, you're going to be faced with these types of questions.
CLANCY: You know, my friend, Fred Abrahams, pointed something else out. He said, you know, that's the most spectacular story, white phosphorus. The one we should all be looking at – and he said both Israel and Egypt bear some responsibility here – where are the civilians going to get out to? If this noose keeps tightening in Gaza, where do they go? How do they get out? There's no egress routes for any of them. They're trapped in there.
SANCHEZ: Yes, it's a very difficult situation. By the way, before I let you go, do you think this will be over before Barack Obama takes office? Because it's going to be difficult for Israel-
CLANCY: Yes.
SANCHEZ: -to start this new administration with this going on.
CLANCY: As I look at it, come on, we're talking about a week, right?
SANCHEZ: Right.
CLANCY: Rick, they're not out in a week. They have declared they will be out. Israel will likely come forward and say, you know, we want to get this truce done. If they can point a finger at Hamas, yes, they would, you know, have a pass to stay. But I think they'll try to say, we're on our way out. But it's going to not get done by the time Barack Obama stands up there and takes the oath of office.
SANCHEZ: Jim Clancy.We thank you for stopping by, as usual.
#From the Thursday, January 15, CNN Newsroom:
RICK SANCHEZ, TEASING THE 3:00 P.M. HOUR: A story with huge international consequences. The United Nations says Israel fired on one of its buildings in Gaza. And they say they used white phosphorus. What do the Israelis say?
...
Now, let's talk about another problem in "Around the World," this one having to do with Israel. The United Nations today said that Israel has attacked one of its buildings, one of its offices there in Gaza. And they're even going as far as to say, and this might be the more shocking part of this report, at least as far as it's being interpreted, that they may have used white phosphorus in that attack. That would obviously be something that's going to get a lot of reaction around the world. Let's do this first as we look at these pictures, now. Pictures coming in from some of the fighting in Gaza, we understand Ben Wedeman has finally been able to get into Gaza, has been able to file some reports for us, now. Ben, start us off, if you're there, tell us what the situation is. And please, if you have any information at all for us on this white phosphorus accusation being leveled by the U.N., tell us what you know.
BEN WEDEMAN: Well, Rick, I have to tell you, from the start, we spent the entire day just trying to get into Gaza. So I haven't really been following those reports as closely as I would normally be. We got into Rafah just after dark, and we're now in an empty apartment on the outskirts of town. But I'm hearing Israeli jets overhead as we've been hearing them for many hours, actually. And one dropped a bomb about, I'd say maybe half a kilometer from here, and it, really, you could feel the pressure, the shockwave from that, it shook the building, it shook the windows. And this seems to be going on constantly here, these over flights and the occasional bombings. At the moment, where we are, the streets are completely deserted. All the stores are closed. There is electricity in this part of town, but I can see other parts of town are completely dark. And as you know, yes?
SANCHEZ: Is there any sign, Ben, that they're becoming more entrenched in this assault or that they're starting conversely, perhaps, to pull back some?
WEDEMAN: There's no indication of that whatsoever, certainly not here. Now, what residents are telling me is that compared to the last few days, the bombing has been less intense. But, as we've seen those pictures coming from Gaza City, and as we were driving across the Sinai when we stopped in various places to load up with supplies, everybody was watching TV, live Jazeera pictures of intense fighting, intense bombing of Gaza City. So even though it does seem diplomacy is starting to actually have an effect, on the ground it seems the Israelis continue to pursue this offensive. As we heard from Ehud Barak, the Israeli defense minister, at the beginning of this operation, he said they would pursue it, in his words, "to the bitter end."
SANCHEZ: Wow. Ben Wedeman following that story for us there. He's out now, as you can see here, actually in Gaza. We've been hoping that Ben was able to get in. Ben, thanks so much for being with us and try to stay safe, my friend.
WEDEMAN: All right.
SANCHEZ: Jim Clancy joining us now to bring us up to this report that we made moments ago. It's the U.N. saying one of their buildings was attacked by the Israelis, by the IDF. And they're saying or accusing Israel of using white phosphorus. How big a deal is this?
JIM CLANCY, CNN INTERNATIONAL CORRESPONDENT: Well, it's a big deal on one level because here you have, it's another U.N. installation. Israel is once again saying they fired at us first; somebody was using the compound to fire at us. They've said this in the past. The U.N. is denying that. Who's telling the truth? Impossible to tell. The actual independent observers can't get in there.
SANCHEZ: But let's go through this. First they said that they were using white phosphorus and they denied it. Then they said, then they were accused of using white phosphorus on people and they denied it, and now they're accused of using white phosphorus on the U.N. building. After awhile there starts to be a pattern, there. This is not helpful for Israel around the world, if for no other reason, through perception.
CLANCY: Well, and you've got it right. You look at it here, and obviously they say it's an obscurant, used as an obscurant, meaning a smoke screen. That's fine. Not in a civilian area. When you-
SANCHEZ: All Gaza is civilian – is there anything – is there any pastures in Gaza? Is there any place out there that's not heavily-
CLANCY: No, there's not. When you look at these, and they’re dramatic pictures that come in, and you see all of this, what you have to realize is, as this battle is going on, the Hamas fighters are down in underground tunnels when this stuff is hitting. The people up top are the civilians. And it's going to raise serious questions here, and it's going to raise questions because General Dynamics, a U.S. company, has developed this weapon. And it is said to-
SANCHEZ: Made in America.
CLANCY: Made in America. You've got cases where people say, hey, doesn't this violate the Export Control Act that says you can't use these weapons?
SANCHEZ: Some people will question whether there's not some culpability-
CLANCY: It's a lack and respect of human life, we're seeing right now, by both sides. Not by one side, by both sides.
#From the Thursday, January 15, American Morning on CNN:
JOHN ROBERTS, DURING THE 6:00 A.M. HOUR: Returning to our breaking now, right now a column of black smoke rising over Gaza city as flames race through the United Nations central compound for humanitarian aid. The complex houses food, fuel, medicine and about 700 Palestinians who were seeking refuge from the fighting. Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak says the incident was a grave mistake. Joining me now on the phone from Gaza city is John Ging. He's the head of operations in Gaza for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency. Mr. Ging, what's the current situation on the ground there in your complex?
VOICE OF JOHN GING, UNRWA DIRECTOR: The current situation is very, very dangerous, and now we have a fire, and our compound has been hit a number of times this morning under this all night long barrage of artillery and tank fire into this area of Gaza city, which is very densely populated. So they shot one artillery shell and hit one of our buildings where three were injured, and then we are dealing with three more rounds that were fired into the compound, which have caused phosphorus fires.
ROBERTS: Right.
GING: My staff on the ground extremely lucky that they were not injured when those rounds hit into the workshops area, the warehousing area. And now, they're on fire basically and, of course, it's a major problem there because those people should know you can't touch phosphorus with water otherwise it becomes very toxic.
ROBERTS: Right. Yes.
GING: Water doesn't put them out.
ROBERTS: Let me just drill down on that for a second if I could. As we said, Defense Minister Ehud Barak says this was a grave mistake. You claim that it was white phosphorus artillery shells that hit the compound. Phosphorus, as you said, when you pour water on it, the fire just gets worse. The only way to try to put out the fire is to smother it with sand or some other compound. But this idea that they're using white phosphorus shells which will burn anything short of metal and will give extraordinary burns to human beings, all the way down to the bone, any idea why they're using white phosphorus shells in an area like that?
GING: No, that's the question which you might need to put to them. That's the question that you need to course through them. I'm now here at the receiving end. It looks likes phosphorus. It smells like phosphorus, and it's burning like phosphorus. That's all I can say. That's why I'm calling it phosphorus. We're trying to deal with this. Our whole transport compound is on fire, and now that's in danger of spreading into the warehouse with all the food and medicine, thousands of tons of food and medicine. This is a hub of the whole operation, the whole United Nations operation here in Gaza. This is the hub. This is where it all comes to, gets distributed from.
ROBERTS: Right.
GING: We were hugely fortunate this morning that the tankers of fuel, thousands upon thousands, hundreds of thousands bases of fuel ready to be deployed, but they didn't go up at the same time. We have warned the Israelis hour by hour through the night of the vulnerabilities here as the shells came closer and closer and shrapnel was coming into the compound on a regular occasion and nonetheless, we have now been subjected to these direct hits.
ROBERTS: All right. Well, boy, don't know what you can do if you can't even get the emergency equipment there. Best of luck to you, John. We'll keep on following the story this morning.
GING: Thanks a lot.
#From the Thursday, January 15, American Morning on CNN:
KIRAN CHETRY, DURING 7:00 A.M. HOUR: All right, we're coming up on a minute before the top of the hour. And thick black smoke is blanketing Gaza City. It's coming from an inferno at a United Nations relief compound. One U.N. official telling CNN that it was hit with white phosphorus artillery shells. International law forbids using them in densely populated civilian areas. A U.N. spokesman says 700 Palestinians were taking shelter there. Hundreds more could be affected as food and fuel and medicine is burning inside.
#From the Thursday, January 15, American Morning on CNN:
JOHN ROBERTS, DURING 8:00 A.M. HOUR: New pictures to bring you this morning, looking live at Gaza City. This is the United Nations relief and works compound. We had John Ging, who's the director of the relief agency in Gaza, on a little while ago. Apparently what had happened was two or three Israeli artillery shells fell on that compound. According to John Ging, those shells were loaded with phosphorus, which is highly incendiary, it burns in the presence of air. The only way to put it out – you can't put it out with water, that actually makes the fire worse. The only way to put it out is to smother it. Because of all the fighting going on in the area, emergency crews can't get to that compound. A couple of people who were hurt in that attack, which the defense minister on the Israeli side quoted grave mistake. At this point, we don't know the extent of the damage. It was confined to buildings, but John Ging was worried that it was going to spread to the warehouse where a lot of relief supplies, particularly medicines, are being stored. A very grave situation unfolding in Gaza City. You can see just pillars of thick black smoke billowing out of the United Nations relief and works compound after it was hit by Israeli artillery shells, allegedly containing white phosphorus.
#From the Monday, January 12, Anderson Cooper 360 on CNN:
ANDERSON COOPER: Nic joins us again live. Nic, just on the white phosphorus charges, a military is allowed to use white phosphorus on the battlefield for illumination purposes, not against individuals. Is that correct? Am I wrong?
NIC ROBERTSON: No, that's absolutely correct. And that's what Israeli officials are saying. They're saying, we have got the same ammunitions in our weaponry that, for example, NATO forces, U.S. forces have. And we know that, for example, in the Fallujah operation in Iraq in 2004, U.S. troops used white phosphorus for illumination. It's when it falls to the ground, before it fully burns out, that it causes these types of casualties.
—Brad Wilmouth is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.




ALLEN PIZZEY: These images are part of what Amnesty International calls indisputable proof the Israeli military illegally used white phosphorus in Gaza. The smoke producing and incendiary chemical is banned in civilian areas because of its intense heat and fumes. The Israelis admit firing 200 white phosphorus shells, but deny breaking international law. The last bombing raid here was a week ago. The area is littered with piece of shrapnel and bits of sticky, gummy brown material like this. Rub it, it bursts into flame and emits an acrid smoke. Distinct characteristics, experts say, of white phosphorous. Saba Halema's hands are an example of the kind of wound white phosphorus inflicts.
DAN HARRIS: It's been a week since the fighting in Gaza ended, but both sides are being dogged now by complaints that they violated the rules of war. Israel has come under especially tough criticism for its use of a chemical agent. Simon McGregor-Wood is in Jerusalem tonight.














Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Excellent job
October 17, 2009 - 09:13 ET by BDExcellent job Brad:
Something that the press has only lightly touched on is the fact that IF Hamas decides to fortify and fight from an urban environment they have the responsibility to evacuate the civil populous from the area they have selected to defend.
Rather than evacuate these civilians they have indeed done everything to encourage civilian casualties in order to allow their allies in the press to give Isreal a black eye over the effort. Thus, Hamas has the onus for the civilian casualties as Isreal has the right to employ the weaponry discussed to screen its movements thorugh the streets of Gaza.
Those journos who are not allied with Hamas (my guess is few) are simply not educated regarding the laws of land warfare and thus simply reach simplistic conclusions.
If the press wished to remedy this issue they could simply start hiring former company grade officers to act as war correspondants. But then the "Bubble Headed Bleached Blonde" who more used to covering the Thanksgiving Day parade would not get to do a stand-up beside a burning tank to gain credibility.
Dressed like a puritan maid.
October 17, 2009 - 10:20 ET by notonmywatchDressed like a puritan maid. Means the audience, though relatively small, is old and conservative.
If only they knew what anti-American leftist crud was being eased down their throats.
___________________________________________________________
Graphical conservative commentary - animations & pictures for posting on forums: http://ubama.org/chu...
Re Excellent
October 17, 2009 - 10:51 ET by slickwillie2001Hamas's favorite place to store weapons including dangerous homemade rockets is in the basement of a hospital. They also launch rockets and mortars from the roofs of those hospitals as well as schools. They know that when the inevitable Israeli self-defense strike comes, they will have a ready-made outrage that the Western media will be all over.
PS Agreed, great article.
Slick rockets
October 17, 2009 - 11:01 ET by Sergeant ROCKOf course, lobbing tens of thousands rockets, homemade or otherwise, into civilian areas annually is not a 'war crime'. According to liberals evidently. It is undeniable that it's an act of terrorism, though.
"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason
Sanchez
October 17, 2009 - 09:25 ET by CO2MakerIs that Spanish for a******? Or perhaps does it mean "anchoring under the influence of leftiness, and leaving the scene of truthiness"?
When did the media abandon Israel? Are a lot of the media really crypto-anti-Semites? Or do the media just, by reflex, pick the side of the schmucks? When France-2 broadcast news footage in 2000 that purported to show Israeli troops shooting and killing Mohammed al-Dura, a 12-year-old Palestinian boy caught in crossfire behind his crouching father, many people readily bought the story that Israeli soldiers were that cold blooded and merciless. They raised a clamor against Israel, the oppressors, the cruel militarists, etc. etc.
But later, when the patent hoax was revealed, when it was proven than the entire scene was staged by the news stringer known to be sympathetic to the Palestinian side, there was practically no coverage of the exposé, no stories to repair the stain on Israel, no serious attempt to unring the bell.
Google "Mohammed al-Dura" and see what you get. I clicked through seven pages and did not see one link to a major media outlet in the U.S.
Google "French TV Palestinian boy Israel" and you'll hit MSNBC and Fox on the first page, and then get this NewsBusters link on the second page:
Media Ran Charges Israeli Troops Killed Boy, Ignore Evidence Israel Innocent | NewsBusters.org
Here are some of the debunking links.
Israel reopens probe into boy's death - Israel-Palestinians- msnbc.com
Engineer Casts Doubt on Veracity of Claims That Israelis Killed Palestinian Boy in 2000 - March 15, 2005 - The New York Sun
Media Ran Charges Israeli Troops Killed Boy, Ignore Evidence Israel Innocent, Brad Wilmouth
Probe: Famous 'martyrdom' <br> of Palestinian boy 'staged'
Suicide Bombings are not a 'War Crime'?
October 17, 2009 - 09:28 ET by Sergeant ROCKIt's funny that if you believe the MSM that groups like Hamas are free to use whatever methods they feel necessary to forward their agenda. And the MSM will always be there to defend or apologize for their tactics or otherwise avoid addressing them altogether.
"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason
Willfull Ignorance
October 17, 2009 - 09:45 ET by richb313The best that can be said, regarding the reporting on this story, is that they are willfully ignorant. The truth is that the media has always used some facts while ignoing others to support the narrative. They already wrote the story and then just picked isolated facts to support that story. That is why everytime I hear any story from any source I am skeptical. It is a lie of ommission. That is one of the worst kind of lies because it is hard to detect unless you already are very familiar with the subject.
I challenge all of you to look at any story, it does not matter the source, and you will find facts that are left out, if which were known, that would change the nature of that story. How often have all of you heard the term narrative when used by news organizations. That is why it is important to have many different sources of news from differing points of view. It is the only way to get all the facts. You will have to wade through half truths, out right lies, opinion masking as facts, and on and on. When you come out the other side your head will spin, and you will have a headache but you will also be better informed. This is one of the reasons I go to this site. It is another source of data.
Everyone is trying to sell you something, but that something is never what you thought it was to begin with. Journalists have years of practice doing this type of story telling and with the Internet you have an overload of information for most people. It is hard to seperate the wheat from the chaff unless you already have a working knowledge on the subject being researched.
Keep up the good work here at News Busters but even this site can be guilty of just using some facts while ignoring others. I am not making any accusations to the fine people here but you have to understand that it is human to not see what you do not want to and to have a fine tuned ear when hearing things that do not support your own views.
On a positive note I have found the accuracy of information contained in the articles and even most of the comments to be accurate. That is to be commended. I am just trying to say that we must be skeptical all the time instead of just being part of the choir.
FRED ABRAMS, HUMAN RIGHTS
October 17, 2009 - 10:01 ET by MidAmericaFRED ABRAMS, HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH: It shoots down more than 100 flaming, burning hot wafers which can set homes on fire and burn civilians. And we're beginning to see that now, deep and troubling wounds. It looks like they're being affected by these, by these bombs in populated areas.
uuhhh... excuse me, but isn't it the indiscriminate shelling of Israel's civilian population by the so-called Palistinians what precipitates retaliation by Israel?
You know MidAmerica.....
October 17, 2009 - 12:23 ET by pantryman....I believe you are correct there...
How is it then that we hear no howling from the MSM over this brand of terrorism? Why is their 'reporting' so totally out of balance?
It sounds so familiar...shades of 'uncle' Walter Cronkite, shaping American opinion against the Vietnam war one 'mis-truth' after another.
For instance Couric calling Willie Peter a 'new horrific' weapon that Israel used against Palenstine is inflamatory rhetoric without a basis in fact.
It is horrific, but it is far from new. As a matter of fact, it has been around for years. So it is a partial truth, but given its context, makes the IDF sound like nasty guys.
I'm white and friggin-A straight proud of it !
coming for the Catholics, Jews again
October 17, 2009 - 10:13 ET by j17ghsSomeone needs to remind Couric and her other Barbie doll friends that this is just a repeat of the 1930s and that, after they come for the Catholics (pretty much done) and the Jews (under way), they will come for the women this time.
But look at the bright side, ladies: burqas are eco-friendly, and you will have more time to pray to Mecca and service your man once you no longer need hair dye, eyeliner, lipstick, dozens of shoes and dresses, blow dryers, spas, etc. You're regressing yourselves a long way, baby!
The problem the world
October 17, 2009 - 10:24 ET by MidAmericaThe problem the world has with Israel is not it's religion. The elites who are opposed to Israel are above religion being much more refined and developed than people who cling to the quaint notion of a 'God'. No, the left-wing elites who dominate the western media, universities and government are opposed to Israels style of politics and nationalism. This is the reason Christianity and and old style American patriotism is under assault. The leftists the world over have one ultimate goal, the complete control over everyone else, from the type of work you do, what kind of home you live in, to the food you can eat. We've all had to deal with what we call in our personal lives 'busybodies', people who just compulsively stick their nose in your personal affairs. So when these people band together in politics their compulsion to control and intrude becomes a threat to individual freedom.
So when leftists compare Christianity to Islam they really view Islam with an admiring appreciation because where Christianity promotes the individual, Islam promotes the submersion of the individual to the religion. That is precisely what the leftists view as the ultimate construction of society. Except in their case it's the individuals complete immersion into the culture of the 'state'.
"opposed to Israels style of
October 17, 2009 - 10:33 ET by notonmywatch"opposed to Israels style of politics and nationalism"
I think it's more basic than that. We too often ascribe to the left rational academic beliefs, but I think far more often it's a tribal belief system. There is the understanding that somewhere someone has the rationale pea under some cup, but what really matters is that if they don't toe the line, they will be ostracised by their peer group, like a child in the playground.
That must be why it's called "socialism". The only thing social about it is that the social structure is the belief normalizer.
___________________________________________________________
Graphical conservative commentary - animations & pictures for posting on forums: http://ubama.org/chu...
Well what I meant by
October 17, 2009 - 11:00 ET by MidAmericaWell what I meant by that was that Israel wants to speak up for Israel's interests. They haven't joined the world's 'elite' leaders to try to bring about a new world order that is not dependent on the shortsighted and 'uninformed' wishes of individual voters.
Obama is a perfect example, he was elected but he thinks his mandate is to do whatever he wants. He does not view himself as a representative of the people who elected him. He sees himself as an autonomous ruler who should impose his views, no matter what the people may want. He won! Obama thinks the people elected HIM. He doesn't understand or care what what those people thought they were voting for. After all, they do not know what is good for them. Making good decisions is the job of the elites.
I don't know. I used to be a
October 17, 2009 - 10:26 ET by BKeyserI don't know. I used to be a Marine Artilleryman. We'd fire willie pete all the time. It made for a really pretty scene at night as an airburst. Like fireworks. Course, if the civillians would put down their weapons and go somewhere else during the fight, maybe they wouldn't get burned. Just an observation...
Cannon fodder
October 17, 2009 - 10:29 ET by Sergeant ROCKIn more advanced cultures, civilians typically avoid being in the target area when there's shooting going on.
"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason
The
October 17, 2009 - 10:52 ET by jessieHThe media also think Hitler was a nice guy, only misunderstood.
Can we declare false reporting of the facts as propaganda
October 17, 2009 - 11:20 ET by Willis_Leon_Johnsonand classify it as a war crime and charge the US media?
How about cnn broadcasting Israeli troop movements to hezbollah? Espionage and treason against Israel is a war crime.
Maybe the UN 'observation post' in southern lebanon passing military information to Israels enemies during that little dustup a few years ago?
A war crime by a, supposedly, neutral organization?
CBS has caused more US military deaths than sadam hussein, with obama trying real hard to catch up.
Every second he delays in approving more troops to Afghanistan encourages the terrorists more and makes them a little braver.
http://gjresult.com
UN trucks delivering
October 17, 2009 - 11:33 ET by wolfemanicUN trucks delivering weapons to the Palistinians was also a very neutral action.
War is cruel, the crueler it is the sooner its over. ~ General Jackson
Stop beating around the Bush
October 18, 2009 - 03:49 ET by Bull Moose ProgressiveStop beating around the Bush. They should say what they feel and say it is a crime punishable by death to not be a Muslim in any part of the world they feel like claiming.
There is phosphorus on tracer bullets.
October 18, 2009 - 13:26 ET by JWFAre you gonna worry about the phosphorus burning you or you gonna worry about the hole the metal part of the bullet leaves?
Sanchez: First they said that they were using white phosphorus and they denied it. Then they said, then they were accused of using white phosphorus on people and they denied it, and now they're accused of using white phosphorus on the U.N. building. After awhile there starts to be a pattern, there.
Yes. There is a pattern. CNN keeps making false accusations.
Sincerely,
a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.