On Monday's Countdown show, substitute hosted by liberal MSNBC political analyst Lawrence O'Donnell, during a segment with Newsweek's Jonathan Alter about former Gove
rnor Sarah Palin's resignation speech from the weekend, Alter referred to what he called Palin's "fibs" and "absurdities" as he reminded viewers that she is very popular in the Republican party despite the flaws Alter and his ilk see in her. Alter: "She is now an icon within the Republican party, and we can, you know, laugh at her and point out all of her fibs and all of her absurdities, but she has a hard core constituency within that party that suggests that her career is not entirely over."
Alter later recounted some of the elements of her weekend speech, including "attacking the national media," and contended that her words would play well with Republicans, "even if it rubs us the wrong way." Alter:
Story Continues Below Ad ↓The whole thing was, kind of, patterned on what you would use as a playbook to try to position yourself for a presidential run. Rejecting the stimulus, you know, every Republican in the House voted against the stimulus, and there were only, what, three in the, in the Senate who voted in favor of it. So, you know, standing there and saying that she's against Barack Obama's recovery plan, good politics within the Republican party. Attacking the national media, good politics within the Republican party. So there was some reason behind a lot of what she said, even if it, you know, rubs us the wrong way.
Below is a complete transcript of the segment with Alter from the Monday, July 27, Countdown show on MSNBC:
LAWRENCE O'DONNELL: Jonathan, let's talk about the quality of the speech. Doesn't it seem that Sarah Palin had much better writers at the Republican convention?
JONATHAN ALTER: Yeah.
O'DONNELL: And has she given a good speech since then?
ALTER: You know, here speech at the Republican convention was written by a guy named Matthew Scully, who had been a Bush speech writer in the White House. And you remember that some of those speeches that President Bush gave, especially around the time of 9/11, were really eloquent, good speeches. And he wrote her a barn burner for that convention. And you're right. She hasn't even come close to matching it since, but I'm not sure if, for the faithful who were out that convention, it matters too much. She is now an icon within the Republican party, and we can, you know, laugh at her and point out all of her fibs and all of her absurdities, but she has a hard core constituency within that party that suggests that her career is not entirely over.
O'DONNELL: And were there key elements in this speech that appeal to those elements in the Republican party?
ALTER: Oh, yeah. I mean, the whole thing was, kind of, patterned on what you would use as a playbook to try to position yourself for a presidential run. Rejecting the stimulus, you know, every Republican in the House voted against the stimulus, and there were only, what, three in the, in the Senate who voted in favor of it. So, you know, standing there and saying that she's against Barack Obama's recovery plan, good politics within the Republican party. Attacking the national media, good politics within the Republican party. So there was some reason behind a lot of what she said, even if it, you know, rubs us the wrong way.
O'DONNELL: How does yesterday's speech compare to Nixon's "You won't have Nixon to kick around anymore." I mean, they both have bitter tones in them, but she delivers her bitterness with a smile.
ALTER: She does, and it's also important and useful to remember that it was only six years after Nixon gave that speech on the night in 1962 when he lost for governor of California that he was elected President. Now, I'm not suggesting that I think the odds are good that Sarah Palin is going to be the next President, but it's really important not to count people out in American politics. People love a comeback, and she is very, very good at what Nixon called the "mobilization of resentments."
O'DONNELL: All right, Jonathan, speaking of predictions of political futures, I want you to leave us tonight with a prediction. What are the chances Alaska Governor Sean Parnell will be picked as the Republican running mate in 2012?
[BOTH LAUGH]
ALTER: I would say those chances are zero. Much better odds, Lawrence, that Sarah Palin will -- since she's not going to go the fancy speech, substantive speech route -- that she'll get a reality TV show of her own and cook moose stew on the air. That's speculation, but you heard it here first.
O'DONNELL: Jonathan Alter, of MSNBC and Newsweek, thank you for your time tonight.
—Brad Wilmouth is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.




LAWRENCE O'DONNELL: Jonathan, let's talk about the quality of the speech. Doesn't it seem that Sarah Palin had much better writers at the Republican convention?














Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Anythng that rubs the "National Media" the wrong way...
July 27, 2009 - 23:03 ET by Army Brathas GOT to be good for the country!
She was my Mayor before whe was my Governor. I expect great things from her.
islam is a lie and Truth is killing it.
Newsweakling on its Last Legs
July 27, 2009 - 23:37 ET by farstar99At the rate they're laying people off, with their plummeting circulation, and the way they're running out of money, what they think is now irrelevant.
Conclusion?
July 27, 2009 - 23:07 ET by ozarkianThere are only 2 topics that bring the trolls here in droves. With both topics, the trolls go overboard in hyperbole and ad hominen attacks. With both topics, they don't discuss; they drip with scorn and ridicule; their postings are contemptuous as if it's below them to reply to such craziness. But they always do.
When a story appears about one of these topics, they can't stop at one remark -- they come back, growing meaner, posting repeatedly with cackling laughter and sly smirks about "Go ahead." "Keep it up." "We love how you're destroying the GOP forever with your wacky, loony, tinfoilhat, exteme-right-wing conspiracy theories."
They may even post repeatedly under different names or quote (gasp) conservative sources agreeing with them. They swear they couldn't care less and then come back for more.
What are these 2 topics?
The birth certificate and Sarah Palin.
WHY do these 2 topics drive them wild?
What's your conclusion?
You have a good point.
July 28, 2009 - 00:45 ET by Free StinkerYou have a good point. :-)
"Gov. Palin has been subjected to one of the most massive and dishonest pile-on smear attacks in the history of liberal media." -- Lowell Ponte
I seriously hope Mrs. Palin
July 27, 2009 - 23:11 ET by RR GOPI seriously hope Mrs. Palin and her family are well protected. If these loons talk about her like this on national (sort of) TV, I can only imagine the fanatics out there in the woodwoork and shadows.
One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 61% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory (yep...approval for Congress now at 39%...do you believe that!?).
rubs us the wrong way
July 27, 2009 - 23:38 ET by casel21If by "us" he means himself and his statist pals, I say "mission accomplished, Sarah."
Note:
July 28, 2009 - 01:08 ET by ToenexIf the cat thinks it is being rubbed the wrong way, then let the cat trun around.
And why is it if she is so bad for the GOP how come they don't just let her alone to kill the party. Because she's not from the network of self centered people that run the country now. And if she feels like it she can take it to the top, and yea they know it.
Authority isn't truth, truth is authority
"Les Moore"
A coupla minor changes...
July 28, 2009 - 04:19 ET by Vivaldi5Hmm, with a simple change of gender pronouns and party--
--Johnny Alter's actually provided a pretty good capsule summary of Keith Olbermann!
I thought that was a more
July 28, 2009 - 05:42 ET by DontFeedTheTrollsI thought that was a more apt description of Obama. There is no end to the 'fibs' he has made along with his absurd pronouncements. He is an icon, now and forever, within the (D) party and he has a hard core constituency within that will never admit a single flaw, fault, mistake whilst blaming all accusations of such on so-called racism.
D
Write Congress and Senate and tell them what YOU think!
Keep the ILLEGALS out, join NumbersUSA to send free faxes to your reps.
Reporter interviewing reporter???
July 28, 2009 - 06:20 ET by VT Con ManWhat is with these BS shovelers? Opining their hatred of anyone who speaks their mind and is the least bit conservative.
Good news is no one even buys their rag anymore, so they have to go on the news shows, that no one watches anymore, to make their outlandish remarks about the despised conservative Mom. Wow, I suspect Mrs Cleaver would not be impressed.
Fibs and Absurdities?
July 28, 2009 - 06:37 ET by allanfI wish Alter would be more specific. What fibs? Did she falsely claim not to raise taxes?
O'Donnell is a despicable, hate-filled POS
July 28, 2009 - 06:37 ET by SickofLibsO'Donnell is a despicable, hate-filled POS and as such is the perfect sub for Olbermann.
Here's how low they went Monday night: at the end of the show they ran a montage of Palin's "embarrassing moments" (all of them BS, BTW) and they threw in that famous clip of little Piper Palin licking her palm and lovingly smoothing Trig's hair.
Of course the montage was really Olbermann's-Greatest-Palin-Bashing-Moments, with him setting up each clip in his trademark viscious schtick.
Who sez you can't direct a show from your bathtub?
Palin derangement syndrome in full voice
July 28, 2009 - 08:11 ET by jondelwicheLast night, the Tonight show did a bizarre reading of her speech with William Shatner. It was a theatre of the bizzare, with Shatner looking like a Munchkin standing next to Conan. Needless to say, I turned after this display of hatred.
I hope they have plenty of viewers.
-
July 28, 2009 - 08:56 ET by slickwillie2001This space intentionally left blank
Re Tonight Show
July 28, 2009 - 08:51 ET by slickwillie2001I haven't stumbled across COB's ratings lately, but I can't believe he's anywhere near Leno. Since before college the Tonight Show has been a ritual for me, if only the monologue. No longer; the show now is not the Tonight Show, it's COB's old show moved up an hour earlier, complete with all the lame devices and snide liberal politics.
Maybe in the end I'll get more needed sleep.
The only absurdity..
July 28, 2009 - 08:35 ET by Lord Erond...is that anyone relies on Alter's opinion for anything.
I'm not worried though, with Newsbusters following it for business reasons, that brings the number of people who read or listen to Jonathan Alter to...2.
"Let him who would move the world, first move himself." -Socrates
"We sit together, the mountain and I, until only the mountain remains." -Li Po
I wonder if it has ever
July 28, 2009 - 09:17 ET by NL207I wonder if it has ever occurred to Jonathan Alter that HE rubs us the wrong way?
"Abusurdities"?
July 28, 2009 - 09:44 ET by BlondeThat's rich....considering we have the gaffe master occupying the office of VPOTUS.
I hope he fails, too.
Sarah of Liberty
July 28, 2009 - 10:19 ET by slickwillie2001Here's something guaranteed to make those with PDS heads explode:
Sarah of Liberty: http://iowntheworld.com/blog/?p=4758
I wonder if Alter could
July 28, 2009 - 11:56 ET by mattmI wonder if Alter could withstand the scrutiny and unfair attacks Palin has had to endure....
She called the media on making things up, and here they come to prover her right, again....
Newsweek: blah, blah, blah
July 28, 2009 - 12:53 ET by cajuncocoaIf someone rubs Newsweek the wrong way, that just means they've done something incredibly right.
Boy, they really hate it
July 28, 2009 - 13:37 ET by MazziBoy, they really hate it when we take the rules from their "playbook" and use it against them, don't they? Or, should I say, when they "project" that we are using their own game against them.
In reality, I think that Palin is following her common sense. I don't think that she follows anyone's rules, and that is what makes her such an icon to those of us with an inherant love for individuality, and such a threat to the sheeple who all wear the "libtard" brand.
"I would rather be historically accurate than politically correct" ~ My husband's T-Shirt
July 28, 2009 - 13:56 ET by jessieHI agree with one thing Alter said. Sara Palin will not be picked to be a running mate. She will be nominated to be the President. And I believe she will win, big time. Maybe not as a republican, but the party doesn't matter. The repubs. & the dems. are like the Hatfields & McCoys. They do more feuding than doing their jobs.
These media morons are just
July 28, 2009 - 13:57 ET by MazziThese media morons are just clueless. Consider this:
"So, you know, standing there and saying that she's against Barack
Obama's recovery plan, good politics within the Republican party.
Attacking the national media, good politics within the Republican
party. So there was some reason behind a lot of what she said, even if
it, you know, rubs us the wrong way"
They obviously believe that Palin is taking the stand against Obama's {cough,cough} recovery plan and the media is a political ploy designed to earn her votes. It never even occurs to them that her stand is because she BELIEVES that both are wrong. They cannot grasp the idea that some people make their decisions based on their own values and ethics, rather than simply saying anything to get elected.
As anyone who observes human nature knows, most people see things within their own frame of reference. Thus ethical sleazebags never even consider that others do not hold their same lack of integrity.
The sad part is that the media is stocked with these morally questionable people. It's almost as if, somewhere in their elitist education, they were taught that "winning" is all that matters, no matter how much of their soul they need to sell to the devil to achieve.
"I would rather be historically accurate than politically correct" ~ My husband's T-Shirt