On Friday's Hardball, during the show's regular "Big Number" segment, Chris Matthews went after Mike Huckabee for quipping during Thursday's FNC presidential debate that those who attack the American military should be prepared to see the "gates of hell," as the MSNBC host asked if we're all "learning to talk like jihadists now," and contended that Huckabee's comments earn him a "10" on the "irresponsibility scale." Notably, Huckabee's remark was very popular with "Republican-leaning" focus group participants as shown by pollster Frank Luntz Thursday night during FNC's post-debate coverage, as the former Arkansas governor's words scored around 90 percent in terms of approval. (Transcript follows)
With the words "What the Huck?" displayed on screen, Matthews introduced a clip of Huckabee's statement as part of "the contest to see who can pound his chest the hardest." After playing the former governor's words, Matthews shook his head while smirking and responded: "So let me get this straight: This man with no foreign policy experience thinks the best way to engage the world is by threatening the potential enemy with the 'gates of hell.' Are we all learning to talk like jihadists now?"
The MSNBC host went on to label the comment as the "height of irresponsibility" as he referred to an "irresponsibility scale." Matthews: "On an irreponsibility scale, from 1 to 10, Huckabee's threat is a 10, the height of irresponsibility."
By contrast, after Thursday's debate, Luntz appeared on FNC with a focus group of what he described as "Republican-leaning voters," and, referring to Huckabee's words as "one of the best lines of the evening," and the reaction as "one of the most positive responses that we've tested," Luntz recounted that the focus group participants scored the line very highly.
Below is a complete transcript of Matthews's comments from the Friday January 11 Hardball on MSNBC, followed by the relevant portion of FNC's post-debate coverage from Thursday January 10:
From the Friday January 11 Hardball:
CHRIS MATTHEWS: In the contest to see who can pound his chest the hardest, today Mike Huckabee is the victor. Take a look.
MIKE HUCKABEE: I think we need to make it very clear -- not just to the Iranians, but to anybody -- that if you think you're going to engage the United States military, be prepared not simply to have a battle, be prepared first to put your sights on the American vessel, and then be prepared that the next thing you see will be the gates of hell, for that is exactly what you will see after that.
MATTHEWS: So let me get this straight: This man with no foreign policy experience thinks the best way to engage the world is by threatening the potential enemy with the "gates of hell." Are we all learning to talk like jihadists now? On an irreponsibility scale, from 1 to 10, Huckabee's threat is a 10, the height of irresponsibility. Tonight's big number. Well, that's what it is, tonight's big number.
From the Thursday January 10 post-debate coverage on FNC:
FRANK LUNTZ: We sat down with 28 Republican-leaning voters, and we asked them to react on a second-by-second basis to the entire debate. There were two clips in particular that scored incredibly well, and I want to show our viewers them. First there was Mike Huckabee, and what's interesting is that foreign policy in this debate matters to South Carolina voters, and it matters a lot. Remember that the lines start at 50. The higher that you see the lines go, the more favorable the reaction. Watch how high the conservative, the orange line, and the blue moderate line, watch how high they climb when Mike Huckabee delivers one of the best lines of the evening about what should be done in Iran. Let's take a look.
MIKE HUCKABEE: I think we need to make it very clear -- not just to the Iranians, but to anybody -- that if you think you're going to engage the United States military, be prepared not simply to have a battle, be prepared first to put your sights on the American vessel, and then be prepared that the next thing you see will be the gates of hell, for that is exactly what you will see after that.
[applause]
LUNTZ: Absolutely, absolutely amazing. One of the most positive responses that we've tested.
...LUNTZ: But Mike Huckabee wasn't the only one who delivered a very positive response. Fred Thompson also had his humorous line when talking about Iran and Iraq. Let's take a look at how effective Fred Thompson was in the language of foreign policy.
FRED THOMPSON: I think I agree with the governor on that. You can't take the judgement like that out of the hands of the officers on the ground there. I think one more step, you know, and they would have been introduced to those virgins that they're looking forward to seeing.
[applause]




MATTHEWS: So let me get this straight: This man with no foreign policy experience thinks the best way to engage the world is by threatening the potential enemy with the "gates of hell." Are we all learning to talk like jihadists now? On an irreponsibility scale, from 1 to 10, Huckabee's threat is a 10, the height of irresponsibility. Tonight's big number. Well, that's what it is, tonight's big number.
MIKE HUCKABEE: I think we need to make it very clear -- not just to the Iranians, but to anybody -- that if you think you're going to engage the United States military, be prepared not simply to have a battle, be prepared first to put your sights on the American vessel, and then be prepared that the next thing you see will be the gates of hell, for that is exactly what you will see after that.










Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Um...Chrissy...
January 13, 2008 - 17:50 ET by TheDeuceHow's about the fact that GOPers I know like to hear about strong responses to terrorists? I'll bet they'd get 11s from lefties if some DNC candidate would promise reparations to Iraqis displaced by our 'illegal' invasion.
The usual MSM meme
January 13, 2008 - 17:53 ET by nkviking75It's the usual MSM meme: The evangelical Christian is the moral equivalent of the Islamofascist.
I don't know that Huckabee is the guy to carry it out, but one lesson the libs need to learn is that we need to talk tough and we need to be able to back it up if we expect these Islamic fanatics to be intimidated by us.
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
And...
January 13, 2008 - 17:57 ET by TheDeuceAnd BINGO was his name-o...
Another thing...
January 13, 2008 - 17:56 ET by TheDeuceI find the use of the line 'What the Huck?' more than a little offensive. But, seems MSNBCers can't help themselves....they go snarky at the drop of the hat. They prove that they can't compete with FOX, so they line up more logically as John Stewart's nemesi.
Chrissy
January 13, 2008 - 19:24 ET by well99"MIKE HUCKABEE: I think we need to make it very clear -- not just to the Iranians, but to anybody -- that if you think you're going to engage the United States military, be prepared not simply to have a battle, be prepared first to put your sights on the American vessel, and then be prepared that the next thing you see will be the gates of hell, for that is exactly what you will see after that."
Chrissy key word engage:vti military fight somebody: to fight or begin a battle with an enemy
Chrissy should he have said prepare to get roses and bon bons?
Potty Mouth Matthews
January 13, 2008 - 22:16 ET by Lame CherryHmmm so what the huck is up with that hucking whining Matthews who is such a hucking huck up.
I even had trouble writing that as it made me wince speaking that way in public...........and yet MSNBC thinks it is cute.
Never will understand liberals.
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
Amazing how a Leftist can
January 13, 2008 - 22:36 ET by Chris NormanAmazing how a Leftist can compare the GOP to Nazis and Matthews doesn't blink, but let a Republican use comparitively mild language about a terrorist nation and oh boy, he has to make an issue out of it....
You don't win by talking like them
January 14, 2008 - 04:39 ET by SlicksterYou win by killing like them, everyone is a target, hide in the mosque, you bomb the mosque.
I have to agree with Matthews
January 14, 2008 - 09:31 ET by Dee BunkI thought the "Gates of Hell" comment was inappropriate for a Presidential candidate. I thought Huckabee did an excellent job when questioned about the wife submission to the husband philosophy. All Religious Republicans could learn from that. It was a flawless explanation and defense of his faith. Unfortunately his excellent explanation was overshadowed by the "Gates of Hell" comment and that is all that will be remembered.
These Liberals are getting
January 14, 2008 - 09:32 ET by ConservativeRexThese Liberals are getting more confused as time goes by. But just so things get cleared up, I kind of want to disect a little bit of it. For one, the Libs LOVE the jihadist, (religion of peace and so on...yeah I got it) so...if they love the jihadist, and they call Huckabee a jihadist (or like a jihadist) are they saying they now LOVE Huckabee because he's like a jihadist?? Man, now I'm confused..