If Occupy Wall Street Really Hated Wall Street, They'd Target George Soros
By Ann Coulter | October 20, 2011 | 16:10
The worst thing about Occupy Wall Street is that it's ruining a good cause: hating Wall Street. Just when opposing Wall Street was gaining momentum, these brain-dead zombies are forcing us to choose between thieving bankers and them.
If the Flea Party were really concerned about the greedy "Wall Street 1 Percent," shifting money around to make themselves richer and everyone else poorer, their No. 1 target should be George Soros.
Of course, we don't know exactly how much money Soros has, since he keeps all his money in offshore bank accounts.
We do know that Soros has been convicted of insider trading. And we know that his general modus operandi is to run around the world panicking sovereign nations, so he can pocket the difference when their currencies collapse.
But the Occupy Wall Street protesters love Soros! It's Fox News they hate.
Last week, the great minds of the OWS movement, bored with playing bocce ball and getting stoned, decided to protest at the homes of Wall Street's robber barons. They then proceeded to walk right past George Soros' apartment building in order to protest at the homes of Rupert Murdoch and David Koch.
THEY'RE NOT WALL STREET!
You may not like Koch and Murdoch's products -- fertilizer and media -- but neither one has anything to do with Wall Street. Unlike money manipulators such as John Corzine (Democrat), Robert Rubin (Democrat) and George Soros (Democrat and Obama's biggest supporter), Koch and Murdoch make money from corporations that actually produce something.
They take risks, make things and get menaced by the government. Wall Street schemers take no risks, produce nothing and get bailed out by the government.
Even assuming, for purposes of argument, that Koch and Murdoch are as evil as these morons seems to think, the protesters call their demonstration "Occupy Wall Street," not "Occupy Businesses Whose Products We Disapprove Of."
This would be like protesting the Holocaust by walking past Adolf Hitler's house and protesting at O.J. Simpson's house.
The Flea Partiers try to win good will by pretending to protest "Wall Street" -- but they ignore Wall Street's villains. They claim to speak for 99 percent of Americans, but their sponsor, George Soros, would be delighted if America collapsed and the 99 percent were impoverished. All he cares about is his own power and pocketbook.
Recall that when the markets first opened after 9/11 and little grandmothers in Iowa were patriotically calling their local savings banks to find out how to buy a share of stock so that the American stock market wouldn't crash because of the terrorist attack, Soros said: Sell, sell, sell!
Now he's helping the cretinous Occupy Wall Street protesters.
Liberals love mob movements because you can't get mobs to think, which is perfect for Democratic ideas.
Do the Wall Street protesters even know that Obama got more money from Wall Street than any other candidate, ever?
These pea-brained protesters either admire or have never heard of the most egregious of the Wall Street looters and their co-conspirators: Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Franklin Raines, Jamie Gorelick, Jim Johnson, Rahm Emanuel, Chris Dodd and Barney Frank. Democrats all!
They have no idea that George Soros has a hand-in-glove relationship with the Democrats, having bought a whole slew of them, including Obama, Al Gore, Hillary Clinton, Charles Schumer, Joe Biden, John Kerry, Patrick Leahy, John Corzine, Barbara Boxer, Mary Landrieu, as well as the Democratic National Committee.
Hamptons-vacationing, helicopter-flying, Russell Simmons party-attending New York bankers always give about 80 percent of their political contributions to Democrats.
And the Democrats always return the favor.
In the 1990s, President Bill Clinton repeatedly bailed out his friends at Goldman Sachs and Citibank under the tutelage of his Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin -- former chairman of Goldman Sachs. U.S. taxpayers were fleeced to prop up nations that were about to default on risky bonds purchased by Goldman and Citibank, such as Mexico (in 1995), Thailand, Indonesia and South Korea (in 1997), and Russia (in 1998).
Of course, if the bonds turned a profit, only Goldman and Citibank would benefit.
This is the Democrats' idea of "capitalism": Rich, Democratic-donating bankers get to engage in wild risk-taking; if the bets pay off, they keep all the winnings, but if the bets lose, they still keep the winnings, and the taxpayers get stuck with the bill.
Democrats are firm believers in the welfare state for their own constituents, whether that's a crack addict mother of five or a Wall Street banker.
Are the protesters aware that the Democrats' 2010 "financial reform" bill provides for future bailouts of reckless banks? Goldman Sachs and Citibank strongly supported the bill.
The protesters don't care -- they have no interest in actual malfeasance by actual Wall Street bankers. They're too busy denouncing Fox News. (Which did not, incidentally, receive a taxpayer-funded bailout.)
And these are the intellectuals of the Occupy Wall Street movement! Never mind the ones who just think stuff should be free and America is the moral equivalent of al-Qaida. They either know that they are benefiting Wall Street looters or are utterly brainless.
Given a choice between Wall Street looters and protesters defecating in the street, throwing rocks at police and chanting "Fók the USA," most people will choose Wall Street.
As always, the mob is serving liberalism.
- Ann Coulter's blog
- Login to post comments




















Comments
Mind Numbed Robots
Submitted by Schofield Kid on Thu, 10/20/2011 - 5:26pm.
That's the joke Rush always uses about his listeners because that is what was said to make up his audience by the MSM. These OWS cretins aren't even robots, they're the Walking Dead spouting off talking points from their Marxist professors and DailyKos..."It's the Corporations man!" "power to the people" " we want free stuff man" and on and on. They have no idea what their lives would be like without the corporations they endlessly bitch about. It's time to get out the fire hoses or whatever it takes to clean this filth off the street.
This is your brain on Liberalism
Submitted by kata on Thu, 10/20/2011 - 5:37pm.
This is your brain on Liberalism.
The most ironic thing I've read today
Submitted by bkeyser on Fri, 10/21/2011 - 9:35am.
(but it's only 9:34am) Apparently the OWS movement is experiencing some leaderless pains.
OWS Seattle is also suffering some problems
Submitted by kata on Fri, 10/21/2011 - 11:02am.
The PoC (People of Color) Caucus self segregated two nights ago and came back with the proposal last night to rename OccupySeattle to "Decolonize Seattle" or "Decolonize/DeOccuppy Seattle" saying that the word occupy was too harsh and was it ignored the history of the US people as being the "original Occupiers of the land of the Indigenous People of North America". And also to those places The US currently "occupies" such as Iraq and Afghanistan.
The whole meeting imploded. People "who had been there longer" (as in your article, tenure is now important) felt the movement had been co-opted by people with their own agenda. I will really be curious how many people will be there when the temp drops to 0 and the wind is at -20.
I like the first comment on the article you linked : It appears these self-important mouth breathers have stumbled @$$-backwards into the governing concept of Federalism and don't even know it.
hehehe.