ABC, CBS Whack Bachmann with PolitiFact, Have Spared Obama Similar Drubbing
ABC and CBS have both recently wielded PolitiFact as a club to bash Congresswoman Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.), yet in the 29 months since President Barack Obama took office – despite 49 "false" ratings in Obama's PolitiFact file – the three broadcast networks have cited the fact-checking website only once to challenge the Democratic commander-in-chief.
ABC host George Stephanopoulos on Tuesday's "Good Morning America" used PolitiFact as an excuse to badger Bachmann about her past statements, while CBS host Bob Schieffer on Sunday's "Face the Nation" pressed the Republican presidential candidate to answer to a spate of PolitiFact judgments against her.
"But, as you make progress in this campaign, everything you say is going to get more scrutiny," lectured Stephanopoulos. "And the Pulitzer Prize-winning website PolitiFact has said you have the worst record of making false statements of any of the leading contenders."
"A lot of your critics say you have been very fast and loose with the truth," accused Schieffer. "You know, the PolitiFact, which is a website that won a Pulitzer, did an analysis of 23 statements that you made recently. Of these 23, only one they said was completely true. Seven they call 'pants on fire' kind of falsehoods. Four were 'barely true' and two were 'half- true.' How do you answer that criticism?"
Despite 39 "barely true" and 49 "false" ratings in Obama's PolitiFact file, a Nexis search revealed just a single instance of ABC, CBS, or NBC referencing the fact-check website to dispute statements the Democratic president has made since he took office. Such "false" statements include claiming exports have doubled under his watch, the White House's budget proposal would not add to the national debt, and his administration has never raised taxes. Click here to peruse all of Obama's "false" rulings.
ABC's "This Week," which encourages viewers to visit PolitiFact.com, was the only broadcast news program to mention one of Obama's negative PolitiFact judgments since the president took office. On the December 27, 2009 program, ABC's Jake Tapper called out then-White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs on Obama's broken promise to televise the health care negotiations on C-SPAN before backing away from the charge: "Now, PolitiFact labeled that a broken promise. I'm not, I'm a little bit more generous this Christmas spirit. You still have one more step in the negotiation process."
A transcript of the relevant portions of the CBS "Face the Nation" segment, which aired on June 26, can be found below:
BOB SCHIEFFER: I want to ask you a question that you don't have to answer. I'll preface it that way. You're a proud Christian. And my feeling had always been that people in public life, if they want to talk about their religion and what it means to them, fine. If they don't, that's their business. And you can say, none of your business. But I would like to ask you this question. You can answer it or not answer it. You said you had no idea of going into politics, but God called you to go into politics. If you want to answer that question, I'd like to know the circumstances of that.
Rep. MICHELE BACHMANN, (R-Minn.): Sure. I'll be happy to. I am a Christian, as is my husband. I became a Christian when I was 16 years old. I gave my heart to Jesus Christ. And since that time, I've been a person of prayer. And so when I pray, I pray believing that God will speak to me and give me an answer to that prayer. And so that's what a calling is. If I pray, a calling means that I feel like I have a sense from God which, what direction I'm supposed to go.
SCHIEFFER: But did He, did God tell you he wanted you to run for the Minnesota State Senate or something like that?
BACHMANN: I prayed about that as well. And that's really what that means. It means that I have a sense of assurance about the direction I think that God is speaking into my heart that I should go.
SCHIEFFER: I want to ask you about something else. A lot of your critics say you have been very fast and loose with the truth. You know, the PolitiFact, which is a website that won a Pulitzer, did an analysis of 23 statements that you made recently. Of these 23, only one they said was completely true. Seven they call "pants on fire" kind of falsehoods. Four were "barely true" and two were "half- true." How do you answer that criticism? Because here's one of them. You know, you said on the record there had been only one offshore oil drilling permit during the Obama administration. And in fact, at that time, there had been 270. How do you explain that?
BACHMANN: Well, you know, I think that what's clear more than anything is the fact that President Obama has not been issuing the permits that he should have been issuing on offshore drilling. That's why we're in the problems we're in.
SCHIEFFER: But it has to be more than 300 now. At that time, there had been 200-and-something, and you said there had been only one.
BACHMANN: But, as far as drilling goes, we hadn't been drilling what we need to. That's why we just saw this week...
SCHIEFFER: But that's different, isn't it?
BACHMANN: Well, that's why, this week, it's ironic and sad that the president released all of the oil from the Strategic Oil Reserve because the president doesn't have an energy policy.
SCHIEFFER: Do you think that was a good move?
BACHMANN: He has a politically correct environmental policy.
SCHIEFFER: Was that a good thing?
BACHMANN: It was a very bad move. It put, it has made the United States more vulnerable. There's only a limited amount of oil that we have in the Strategic Oil Reserve. It's there for emergencies. We do not, the emergency that we have is the fact that the president of the United States has failed to give the American people an energy policy. Here's the good news that a lot of Americans don't even realize. We are the number one energy-resource-rich nation in the world, according to the Congressional Research Service. But the president of the United States has unfortunately put American energy resources off limits. We need to open those up so we can bring down the price of gasoline at the pump. The president has it exactly wrong when it comes to energy.
SCHIEFFER: Just quickly, though, the original question I asked you is all of these statements that you have made that have later proven to be sort of true or totally false in some cases, what's your answer when people say that to you? Do you feel you have misled people?
BACHMANN: No, I haven't misled people at all. I think the question would be asked of President Obama, when you told the American people that, if we borrow $1 trillion from other countries and spend it on a stimulus, that we won't have unemployment go above 8 percent, and today, as we are sitting here, it's 9.1 percent and the economy is tanking – that is what's serious. That's a very serious statement that the president made. Did he mislead the American people? Not only did he mislead the American people, he's caused our economy to go down to depths that we haven't seen. That's what's serious.
SCHIEFFER: Again, I have to say, Congresswoman, I asked you a question and you, to my knowledge, I don't believe you answered it. But I want to thank you. I know you're very excited about what happened out in Iowa and we wish you the best. Hope to see you down the trail.
BACHMANN: Thank you, Bob.
SCHIEFFER: Thank you.
--Alex Fitzsimmons is a News Analysis intern at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow him on Twitter.
- Alex Fitzsimmons's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
I Think It's Great...
Submitted by SimJim on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 4:53pm.
Bachmann has this technique of answering stupid, gotcha type questions with relevant and damanging information about policy and decisions being made by Obama and his administration. Personally I think the strategy is brilliant, but I'm a huge fan so I'm wonder if it comes across well among more disinterested observers?
In this instance Schieffer is trying to nail her for inconsequential mistakes while ignoring her overall point. Bachmann instead refers to an Obama mistatement or policy gaffe with real negative consequences. I want to believe this technique is a winner, but is it, or are the sheeple listening to Schieffer and faulting Bachmann for not getting down in the mud and wrangling over the inanities of petty mistakes?
"Bachmann has this technique
Submitted by classicliberal2 on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 6:35pm.
"Bachmann has this technique of answering stupid, gotcha type questions with relevant and damanging information about policy and decisions being made by Obama and his administration."
It's called Dodging The Question. It's a despicable habit common with politicians, and one no one should applaud or encourage (and especially not rationalize). The other part of it is that, frequently, she isn't offering "relevant and damaging information" on Obama--she, instead, wallows in lies and misinformation. When Bachmann trashes the administration for only approving one offshore permit when, in reality, it has approved more than 300, that's not an "inconsequential mistake"--it's a lie of astronomical proportions, and in the interview, she showed her usual complete lack of class and basic decency by dancing around the fact that she had uttered such a colossal and embarrassing falsehood, and compounding it with a further lie (her assertion that Obama's failure to approve sufficient permits is "why we're in the problems we're in."). In the same interview, she also claimed "the Congressional Budget Office estimated Obamacare will cost economy 800,000 jobs..." The actual number of jobs the CBO said Obamacare would cost the economy: zero. Because the CBO, in the report in question, didn't offer any projections regarding the effect of the law on employment (the 800,000 figure comes from people who work extra jobs for health coverage who are likely to work less as a consequence of having health coverage available). Again, a lie of astronomical proportions. Schieffer didn't correct her on the show, though CBS did issue a fact-check on their website later.
Obama's the one who deals in "lies of astronomical proportions"
Submitted by Blonde on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 6:44pm.
Go shag your falsehoods somewhere else.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
classicliberal is liable to---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 7:49pm.
eclipse even Obammie-jammie at the rate he's going.
MD
If Barry's Interior Sec.
Submitted by Zippy on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 7:39pm.
If Barry's Interior Sec. approved 300 off shore oil Drilling permits???? Where's the HUGE news story????
Oh, and the 800K in jobs. Those were already bought by the unions and relatives of the DNC. Compared to a 39% increase in Food Stamps. Where are the jobs? Barry said they were shovel ready???
311 M people on 4July, 2011. 10% accountable unemployed = 30 million. Plus 30 million on Food stamps.
That's 60 million. WTF
By the way. CL2. When are you
Submitted by Zippy on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 7:44pm.
By the way. CL2.
When are you Lib's going to hire some Business people?
Having lawyers for a base, has to be, getting expensive.
Paid your dues to the DNCC or your local union, yet?
It's almost time to vote.......
Ask A. Wiener when he is going to pay? He owes 250K.
Zippy, Lord of the Fly, Is selling raffle tickets as we speak.
Submitted by upcountrywater on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 8:04pm.
Manchild is out there knocking on doors, just like a 12 year old.... ain't that hopeful.
No to a link of the sales pitch.
But wait................................ there's more Joe bite-me comes for free
You Didn't Build That.
It's not 300 permits--it's
Submitted by classicliberal2 on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 8:01pm.
It's not 300 permits--it's 296, as of May.
(The rest of the rhetoric aside, you and the other posters, here, are badly mistaken if you take me for an Obama fan, or think that ranting against Obama is any sort of reply to what I've written.)
How about ZERO permits. Screw areas that are bureaucrat approved
Submitted by upcountrywater on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 8:44pm.
where's your Entrepreneurial spirit CLASSIC lib?
Ok how about trusting an oil company for drilling expertise. The oil man thinks oil exists below some safe place to drill and the oil entrepreneur picks up the permit later/ or emails it?
You Didn't Build That.
A correction of my own, and something else
Submitted by classicliberal2 on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 8:11pm.
I wrote that the administration "has approved more than 300" permits for drilling; the actual number, as of May, is 296 (and I can find no more recent data).
On another front, Bachmann, in that interview (and in the quoted material above), offered up another of those lies of astronomical proportions when she said "the president released all of the oil from the Strategic Oil Reserve." SPR has 727 million barrels; Obama has approved release of 30 million.
classiclib*
Submitted by cajun2 on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 9:02pm.
Permits do not mean the same as "drilling". It takes years and millions of dollars to go from permit to oil.
This study is from 2007 and is a brief synopsis of the process of permit to drilling. Since 2007, EPA and OASHA has added dozens of new regulations. This can only further delay actual drilling. Some permits issued may not result in a drill for 5-6 years.
Caj,Your link has no mention of an icebreaker, deal breaker
Submitted by upcountrywater on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 9:40pm.
The EPA’s appeals board ruled that Shell had not taken into consideration emissions from an ice-breaking vessel when calculating overall greenhouse gas emissions from the project.
BUZZZZITT you lose 4 BILLION BUCKS.... on a technicality, and folks wonder why no one wants to take business risks...
Woops, should have rented that Soviet built atomic ice breaker.
You Didn't Build That.
Upcountry gets it*
Submitted by cajun2 on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 10:06pm.
No icebreaker was required in 2007 because of global warming and rising seas./sarc
The difficult part of my link will be explaining all this to classiclib....and I'm not volunteering
He doesn't care, caj
Submitted by Blonde on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 11:32pm.
He has his talking point and your facts aren't going to change it.
Motherbelt's axiom applies.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Ignore the liberal...bias cubed
Submitted by Blonde on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 6:42pm.
I like it.
I'd really like to make the Republican candidates sign the following pledge: (and I'm not a pledge or raise hands kind of person)
I will refuse to respond to liberally biased questions from the media, and instead reframe the question more reasonably before I answer it. Furthermore, I will explain why the question is liberally biased.
There is no upside to playing the liberal idiot game. It's sheer "gotcha" journalism. I think Michele is onto something by going into the lion's den and refusing to play their game.
Once people understand that the Republicans are NOT GOING TO PLAY, they'll stop. And if they don't, it will be apparent to everyone but the extremely biased (i.e. see classical liberal's knee jerk response above) that the questions are totally bogus.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Blonde. I like it.
Submitted by Zippy on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 7:45pm.
Blonde.
I like it.
Thanks, Zippy!
Submitted by Blonde on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 8:26pm.
Wouldn't it be nice to have everyone singing off the same sheet of music in regard to the biased MsM methods?
It would be absolutely wonderful if they'd all get together before the next "debate" and all agree to blow holes in the idiotic liberal questions. I would laugh until I cried. And try to vote for all of them!
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Beating the dead horse
Submitted by Thalpy on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 5:02pm.
Since Stephanopoulos was the cleaner for the Clinton machine's "women" issues, what objectivity is expected? How long will it take for our people to understand that the MSM are traitors to us and to our nation: our deadly enemy? It shouldn't be that difficult to understand.
Just a reminder about some info posted elsewhere.
Submitted by hbnolikeee on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 5:06pm.
Our king is The King of Gaffs. I found the list from NB at the following URL.
The King of Gaffs
My Personal Favorite
Submitted by SimJim on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 5:42pm.
Is when the teleprompter had the Irish prime minister's remarks on it rather than Obama's remarks. Obama is so dependent on the teleprompter that he didn't catch the mistake immediately and got well into delivering rmarks that made no sense coming from him. The media aided in covering this one up so to my knowledge the video is still not available, but the story remains in my humor memory bank!
Who can forget the classic
Submitted by Boudin on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 8:41pm.
* “The Middle East is obviously an issue that has plagued the region for centuries.”
–Barack Obama, Tampa, Fla., Jan. 28, 2010
Media Carries Water
Submitted by cobokat on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 5:47pm.
Everyday I am more and more amazed how the media continues to carry the water for this corrupt administration. We have heard all day about Michelle Bachman and her comment regarding John Wayne yet the media refuses to cover Obama and his giant gaffe when speaking of SFC Jared Monti and the Medal of Honor. What's in it for these people to keep protecting BO??!! I don't get it!!!! We have an illegal alien cover-up by the Janet Napolitano gang in Texas...an illegal war in Libya...White House chefs being auctioned off...What is going on??!!
Speaking of Steffi.....
Submitted by Blonde on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 6:48pm.
How about his threat to Michele Bachmann...."the media will investigate all 23 of your Foster Children"???? Where's the media whine over that?
Barack Obama's children (and his background) are sacrosanct, but it's okay to go after 23 "wards of the state" whom the Bachmann's fostered?
What planet are we living on? Steffi & ABC executives ought to be tossed in jail for the threat.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
As Sherlock Holmes would say
Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 8:38pm.
As Sherlock Holmes would say "Come Watson,the game is afoot". Yes the season of smears is starting. If they only would investigate all like they do the ones they hate.
Michelle doesn't need to be
Submitted by deerjerkydave on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 8:49pm.
Michelle doesn't need to be perfect, just better than Obama. She needs to turn these attacks around by showing that her PolitiFact record is better than Obama's. That will shut them up faster than anything. Remember when Sarah Palin made a gaffe a few months back and when the liberal media started to pounce she began reciting Obama gaffes and it shut them up so fast.
------------------------
"The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the Federal Government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State Governments are numerous and indefinite. -James Madison"She needs to turn these
Submitted by classicliberal2 on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 10:44pm.
"She needs to turn these attacks around by showing that her PolitiFact record is better than Obama's."
They aren't really comparable. Obama, as the President of the United States, is literally the highest-profile politician in the world, and says things every day. Bachmann has a cult following among right-wing political junkies, but to the larger public, she's an obscure congresswoman from a gerrymandered district in Minnesota.
If one does want to try to make the comparison, you're wrong about the results. Obama's record of true-vs.-false comments, as measured by PolitiFact, is proportionately FAR better than Bachmann's. At present, PolitiFact has evaluated 301 comments by Obama. Of those, 210 have been judged to be "half true", "mostly true", or "true." That's a hair-more-than-70% accuracy rate:
http://www.politifact.com/personalities/barack-obama/
PolitiFact has evaluated only 26 statements by Bachmann. Only 3 of them rated as "half true" or better. 23 of them are judged "barely true" (5), "false" (11), and "pants on fire" (7)--the latter a lie of epic proportions (even with the much larger sample from Obama, he only had three "pants on fire" comments). That's an accuracy rate of barely more than 8%:
http://www.politifact.com/personalities/michele-bachmann/
classicliberal2---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 10:55pm.
Figures lie and liars figure. That does not alter the fact that you are a posturing, lying, pos.
Many posters here will calmly point out your lies, and move on. All well and good.
I, however, am not one of them.
"Obama's record of true vs. false comments, as measured by Politifact, is proportionately FAR better than Bachmann's."
Loony, liberal, lying talking points is all you post.
You remind me of a liberal gang banger, walking into a conservative's yard and flashing your ridiculously ignorant gang signs.
The only difference is that you are too stupid to be dangerous; unless of course, you make it to the Oval Office as another ignorant liberal has.
NewsBusters does not belong to me, but as a conservative I belong to NewsBusters, and why your contributions of absolutely nothing but liberal bullshit to these threads - since we can obtain much more than we need from the lying media - is tolerated, is beyond me.
MD