Polls Show Public Has Other Priorities, But Contessa Brewer Urges Senate to Repeal DADT

Alex Fitzsimmons's picture

MSNBC's Contessa Brewer thinks the repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell is a national "priority" that needs to be passed during the lame duck session.

While the Senate considers stand-alone repeal of the ban against openly gay service members today, the MSNBC daytime anchor pressed Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.): "What do you make of the people who say there might not be enough time to do this during the lame duck session? Why not? Shouldn't this be a priority?"

Lieberman, who supports repeal, insisted that repealing the controversial measure now "must be a priority," despite a recent poll showing that only 32 percent of Americans think that taking up the issue is "very important." In fact, 56 percent of the public believes that "passing legislation that would keep the estate tax from increasing significantly" is "very important," and 50 percent believe that extending at least "some form" of the Bush tax cuts is "very important."

Repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell (DADT) ranked second only to the DREAM Act, which would grant a pathway to citizenship for minors, as the least important issue to address during the closing days of the 111th Congress.

During the exchange, the Connecticut independent who caucuses with Democrats let slip the real reason the Democrats think they need to take up DADT before the end of the year: "Repealing Don't Ask Don't Tell has to be done this year because I'm worried we won't have the votes to do it next year."

That's right, repealing DADT is a national priority, according to Sen. Lieberman, not because it is best for the country, but because if Senate Democrats don't pass it now, they probably won't have the votes to do it when the 112th Congress sits in January.

Concurring with Sen. Liebermann about the urgency of the moment, Brewer concluded the segment by asserting that it is "long past time" to repeal the measure.

This is far the first time Brewer has expressed full-throated support for repealing DADT. Her well-documented position on this issue belies her role as an ostensibly neutral anchor.

A partial transcript of the segment can be found below:

MSNBC
News Live
December 16, 2010

12:24 p.m.. EST

CONTESSA BREWER: What do you make of the people who say there might not be enough time to do this during the lame duck session? Why not? Shouldn't this be a priority?

Sen. JOE LIEBERMAN, (I-Conn.): This must be a priority. I mean, this is an injustice, it's un-American to tell people who want to serve our country, want to put their lives on the line. We need them in the military. To tell them no you can't do it because you're gay or lesbian. That's not the American way. The reality is that we've got the votes. It's really up to Senator Reid. In my opinion, we're on the START treaty ratification, nuclear arms control, we're going back Saturday for the funding for the fiscal year coming up. That's got to be done by Saturday night. I believe instead of going back to the START treaty, we should go to the independent, stand-along repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell Saturday night. We can get it done by Monday, maybe Tuesday at the latest, Tuesday morning. Then go back to the START treaty if they want, but repealing Don't Ask Don't Tell has to be done this year because I'm worried we won't have the votes to do it next year. The START treaty can be ratified next year.

BREWER: So just in terms of timing, has Harry Reid told you that he would be willing to do that? What are you hearing from the Senate Majority Leader?


LIEBERMAN: Not yet, but the Senate Majority Leader certainly told me he would bring it to the floor. The House passed it during a special procedure meaning opponents cannot filibuster taking up the bill. They can only have one filibuster on this one, and that is before passage. And as I said, I know we got 61, we might even surprise and get 62, 63 votes. It's time for this to end and for us to be fair about it and get the best possible people we can to serve in our military.

BREWER: Long past time. Senator–

LIEBERMAN: Long past time is right. We can't let the clock, or people's desire to get home. I know everybody wants to get home for Christmas. Most people work up to the day before. If we stay here till Thursday, let's say, and we leave Thursday, that gives people plenty of time to get the repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell done and maybe do the START treaty as well.

BREWER: Senator Lieberman, always a pleasure. I appreciate your time.

--Alex Fitzsimmons is a News Analysis intern at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow him on Twitter.

The only urgency in repealing

The only urgency in repealing DADT is doing it while a Democrat president there to sign the bill.  Otherwise, I hardly think the military is in such dire need of recruiting that they need to allow gays to serve openly...right now.  

Or ever.

Or ever.

Amen.

BK.

Cluntessa, I don't believe a

Cluntessa, I don't believe a liberal moron like you has any business telling anyone what the 'right thing' to do is.

Our military is not the place to play social experiments. Would you like to share a shower with someone who's primary mission interest is not protecting the constitution, but getting you wet and upside-down? On second thought, you might find that exciting, but I won't ask you and please don't tell me, deal?

Did you know Doug has Mesothelioma? We'll deal with the government. You have enough to worry about.

Somebody has got to convince

Somebody has got to convince this thing to come out of the closet, so she shuts up already. Not to mention there's no room in there & everything she wears is always wrinkled......she's not a little thing, by any stretch of the imagination you know.

Barack_Must_Go.....

Why is CNN/Brewer pushing this?

Is Turner coming out? Is Contessa? Anderson(finally)?...they seem to REALLY be pushing this.

I think "MSNBC's Gay Activist Contessa Brewer"...

...is how she should be referred to from now on.

GMTA

I was thinking the same thing, was going to say something to the effect of "And the gay activist of MSNBC Contessa marches on."

For pete's sake, who do you want in the military, libs?  Gay people or soldiers?  There is a distinction.  When you join the military, you are a soldier.  You are not a homosexual, you are not a heterosexual, you are a soldier in a chain of command, not a social club.

Don't like it?  Well, guess what, our military is VOLUNTARY!  You don't have to join if you don't like it!  If you want to be gay soldier boys, form your own damn club called "gay soldiers" or "rainbow shooters" or whatever the hell you want and leave our military alone.

-Jon

You mean,

...GLBT activist.

Above all else, political correctness........................... oh, I think I just threw up in my mouth. :-(

Contessa, my dear <ala Glinda from The Wizard of Oz>

"come out/

come out/

wherever you are..."

She's right there on PMSNBC!

That's just my opinion; I could be wrong. -- Dennis Miller

I can't understand why she is

I can't understand why she is so hell fired set on ruining the military but I guess that is the ultra lib in her. The guys killing the camel washers don't want it. Vets like me don't want it. The only ones are bunch of Kumbya singing idiots and left over 60's hippies.  

A well regulated militia being necessary to a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

The post-DADT military...

Performing close-order drill.

OMG, that was hilarious

.

What do you call a woman who is enamored with gay guys?

Other than "a Midler" or "a Griffin" I mean.

It's really weird. I know she's dumber than dirt, but does she not really understand what "gay" sex is?

RINO Brown

Looks like Scott Brown proved to be a full-fledged RINO.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2010/12/big-boost-for-dont-ask-dont-tel...

How many is the count of RINOs up to? And how many will we have next year?

-Jon

DID YOU SEE THAT?

Isn't that the Colonel over there in the bluie dress?  Sure is.....and the color matches his eyes!  When he walks by, should we salute, or curtsey?  Not too far fetched in a repealed DADT world.  You know what's coming next......transsexuals!  Will the military (Taxpayers) have to pay for their surgery if they plan to "Change" while in the military?  Can pink weapons be far behind?  Will we be blessed with a "Rosie O'Donnell Brigade."  Instead of celebrating Armed Forces Day will we be subjected to "Military coming out Day."  The mind is boggled!

Didn't any of these morons

Didn't any of these morons pay attention when each of the heads of the military branches came out against repeal of this policy?

Do any of these morons understand just what DADT really is? There is NOTHING, I repeat NOTHING in the policy that prohibits these freaks from serving in the military. The only thing, and I repeat ONLY thing this policy does is require them to keep their sexual practices to themselves, that is DON'T IMPOSE THEM ON OTHERS.

I served honorably in the military and there were no doubt homosexuals serving with me. I did not tell them anything about my sexual fantacies, deviations, experiences, preferences, nor did I ask them or want to know theirs. I had very uneasy feelings using open toilets and showers knowing some of them were probably becoming aroused, fantacizing and breathing hard watching me, but I was required to endure it and not discuss it.

I suggest Cluntessa get a life, and when she does, keep it to herself.

Did you know Doug has Mesothelioma? We'll deal with the government. You have enough to worry about.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.